IMPERIAL HOUSING VENTURES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Versus ANIL AGARWALLA AND ANR. NEHA SHARMA[CAVEAT] (C.A. 9095/2022)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 9095/2022

Case Record

C.A. 9095/2022

IMPERIAL HOUSING VENTURES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Versus ANIL AGARWALLA AND ANR. NEHA SHARMA[CAVEAT]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

19 PDF renditions· 19 distinct judicial orders· 18 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

IMPERIAL HOUSING VENTURES PVT. LTD. & ANR. Versus ANIL AGARWALLA & ANR.. C.A. 9095/2022 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010310522022. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 18 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 9 December 2022 to 27 February 2026.

On 9 December 2022 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel, who appears on caveat on behalf of the respondents. 2. Delay condoned.
On 16 January 2023 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Delay condoned.
On 14 February 2023 the order records: The Order dated 09122022 has not been complied with so far. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, undertakes that the amount as per the said Order shall be deposited with the Registry of this Court within two weeks from today.
On 14 March 2023 the order records: 1. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. 2. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellants, rejoinder affidavit be filed within two weeks.
On 25 April 2023 the order records: 1. It is stated by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants that the order dated 09122022 has been complied with and due amount has been deposited with the Registry of this Court. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent in Civil Appeal No.393/2022 seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file Vakala
On 10 September 2024 the order records: IA No.137074/2024 in C.A. No.102/2023 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as the respondent, who is present in-person. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances explained in the application and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the Registry is directed to release the principal amount
On 9 February 2026 the order records: 1. In furtherance to the order dated 10.09.2024, the amount as directed is deposited. Learned counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer inter alia contending that at least they must have deposited the principal amount along with interest as directed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. 2. After h
On 27 February 2026 the order records: 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submits that the matter between the parties has been settled, therefore, the Civil Appeal be treated as disposed of in terms of the settlement. 2. Ordered accordingly.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

9 December 2022. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned counsel, who appears on caveat on behalf of the respondents. 2. Delay condoned.
16 January 2023. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Delay condoned.
1 February 2023. Not to be deleted from the date already notified i.e. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
14 February 2023. The Order dated 09122022 has not been complied with so far. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, undertakes that the amount as per the said Order shall be deposited with the Registry of this Court within two weeks from today.
14 March 2023. 1. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. 2. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellants, rejoinder affidavit be filed within two weeks.
25 April 2023. 1. It is stated by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants that the order dated 09122022 has been complied with and due amount has been deposited with the Registry of this Court. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent in Civil Appeal No.393/2022 seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file Vakala
18 July 2023. Post the matters on 01.08.2023.
1 August 2023. List on 05.09.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
26 September 2023. Post the matters on 31.10.2023.
31 October 2023. List these matters on 30.01.2024.
6 February 2024. Post these matters on 27.02.2024.
4 March 2024. 1. The Registry is directed to list these matters on priority basis on 19.03.2024.
30 April 2024. List on 29.07.2024. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
29 July 2024. Post this matter on 03.09.2024 (NMD).
2 August 2024. Not to be deleted from the notified date i.e., 03.09.2024.
10 September 2024. IA No.137074/2024 in C.A. No.102/2023 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as the respondent, who is present in-person. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances explained in the application and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the Registry is directed to release the principal amount
9 February 2026. 1. In furtherance to the order dated 10.09.2024, the amount as directed is deposited. Learned counsel for the respondent opposes the prayer inter alia contending that at least they must have deposited the principal amount along with interest as directed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. 2. After h
27 February 2026. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submits that the matter between the parties has been settled, therefore, the Civil Appeal be treated as disposed of in terms of the settlement. 2. Ordered accordingly.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Anshuman Tiwari, Ms. Shweta Singh Verma, Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary, Mr. Puggal Renu Gupta, Mr. Pinaki Misra, Ms. Puggal Renu Gupta, Ms. Varsha Rana, Ms. Shweta Rajput, Mr. Pinaki Mishra, Ms. Snehil Sonam Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Anil Agarwalla, Mr. Mahesh Agarwalla, Ms. Neha Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Singh, Mr. Deeptakirti Verma, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Aditya Singh, Mr. Nishant Bhargava, Mr. Vinay Mohan Sharma, Mr. Kamal Kishore, Ms. Aishwarya Wani, Mr. Shubham Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 27 February 2026 the order records: The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 27 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 Feb 2026

Final disposition

The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order.

Important procedural note

Written only from 18 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.