HT MEDIA LIMITED Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER DELHI SOUTH GOODS AND SERVICE TAX [R-1] [ HERAD BY : HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ. ] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES (C.A. 23525/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 23525/2017

Case Record

C.A. 23525/2017

HT MEDIA LIMITED Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER DELHI SOUTH GOODS AND SERVICE TAX [R-1] [ HERAD BY : HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ. ] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

12 PDF renditions· 12 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

HT MEDIA LIMITED Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER DELHI SOUTH GOODS AND. C.A. 23525/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010343842017. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 15 December 2017 to 16 January 2026.

On 9 January 2018 the order records: Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the relevant material. Issue notice.
On 7 March 2018 the order records: Four weeks time is given to the Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 20.4.2018.
On 20 April 2018 the order records: Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 13.7.2018.
On 6 August 2018 the order records: The sole respondent has already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the affidavit of valuation and the ad-valorem court fee within four weeks.
On 24 September 2018 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks', as last chance file the affidavit of valuation alongwith required court fee. List again on 22.11.2018.
On 22 November 2018 the order records: Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the parties have not filed any statement of case within the prescribed period. Hence, list the matter before the Ho'ble Court as per rules.
On 6 November 2025 the order records: 1. Exemption Application is allowed. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties at length.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

15 December 2017. Delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. Registry to proceed further.
9 January 2018. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the relevant material. Issue notice.
7 March 2018. Four weeks time is given to the Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 20.4.2018.
20 April 2018. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 13.7.2018.
6 August 2018. The sole respondent has already filed the counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the affidavit of valuation and the ad-valorem court fee within four weeks.
24 September 2018. Learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks', as last chance file the affidavit of valuation alongwith required court fee. List again on 22.11.2018.
22 November 2018. Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the parties have not filed any statement of case within the prescribed period. Hence, list the matter before the Ho'ble Court as per rules.
1 October 2021. Admitted. To be shown in the regular list in the month of April, 2022.
25 September 2025. List on 15-10-2025.
6 November 2025. 1. Exemption Application is allowed. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties at length.
16 January 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
16 January 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Karan Bharihoke, Mr. Ashok Dhingra, Ms. Smita Singh, Ms. Navkhan Bolay, Ms. Navkiran Bolay, Mr. Siddhant Sharma, Ms. Neha Sahai Bharihoke, Ms. Sonia Gupta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Raj, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr. N. Venkataraman, Mr. Sarad Singhania, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Mr. S. K. Singheria, Ms. Swarupam Chaturvedi, Mr. Vikas Bansal, Mr. V.C. Bharathi, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. S.K.singhania, Mr. P.V. Yogeshwaran

Relief Sought & Granted

On 6 November 2025 the latest order on this record says: 1. Exemption Application is allowed. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties at length.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 16 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 16 Jan 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.