- 6 January 2016. Four weeks time is given to the learned counsel f or the appellants to comply with the terms of the office report. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2016.01.06 List again on 26.2.2016.
- 26 February 2016. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the appellant to comply with the terms of the order dated 06.01.2016 of this Court. List the matter again on 19.04.2016.
- 19 April 2016. Ms. Kirti R. Mishra, Ld.Counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks comply with the terms of the office report. List again on 14.7.2016.
- 14 July 2016. Ld.counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the respondent No.1 in listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders and list thereafter. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2016.07.15 16:27:11 TLT
- 2 September 2016. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in ordering in these applications. Applications for substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 and for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution are allowed as prayed for.
- 24 October 2016. Having considered the facts stated in the application, we request the High Court to expedite the consideration of the application for substitution as ordered by this Court on above terms.
- 19 July 2018. Delay in filing substitution application is condoned. Application for setting aside abatement is allowed.
- 31 October 2018. Counsel for the appellant states that the application for substitution is pending before the High Court and yet to be decided. List the matter after eight weeks.
- 18 January 2019. List after two months.
- 12 April 2019. IA Nos.5 & 6 of 2012 It is submitted that no orders have been passed by the High Court with regard to the deceased appellant No.2. List the matter after two months.
- 1 July 2019. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) states that an application for bringing the legal representatives of deceased appellant No.2 on record is pending before the High Court. She requests for time to await the orders to be passed by the High Court. The application(s) is/are adjourned and will be listed for hearing after
- 25 February 2020. List after four weeks.
- 3 September 2020. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though application(s) for substitution of deceased Ram Milan Singh ( appellant no.2 in C.A. 9531 of 2014 and respondent no.7 in C.A. No. 9532 of 2014 herein) is filed way back in the year 2012 before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the same has not been taken up for hearing
- 9 April 2021. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) wants to file counter to the I.A. No.35739 of 2021. Let such affidavit be filed within two weeks.
- 8 September 2021. At the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, let the matter be adjourned for two weeks.
- 1 October 2021. Heard learned counsel for the applicant on I.A. No. 35739/2021, whereby the applicant is seeking modification of the order dated 3.9.2020. In this application, the facts regarding the filing of the application for substitution in the year 2012 have only been mentioned. In fact, the said application had been filed in Ma
- 15 November 2021. Let these matters be listed along with all interlocutory applications after two weeks. (ARJUN BISHT) (PRADEEP KUMAR) (ASHWANI THAKUR) (
- 28 March 2022. None appeared for the petitioner, list the matter after two weeks. (SHUBHAM YADAV) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 12 September 2022. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that arguments have been heard and judgment is reserved in MCC No.571/2013. Therefore, the matters stand adjourned by six weeks.
- 11 November 2022. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the applications bringing on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner No.2 are pending before the High Court. At the joint request of the learned counsel for the parties the matter is adjourned for four weeks.
- 13 January 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) states that the Review Petition bearing No.50 of 2023 of Order dated 19 th December, 2022 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur has been filed and the same is pending before the High Court. List after six weeks.
- 21 August 2023. Response be filed in both cases to the substitution and the delay condonation application accompanying the same within a month. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel that a similar matter i.e. Dy. No.30679 of 2023 (which is shown as defective) has also been filed.
- 30 October 2023. Delay in filing the application for setting aside abatement is condoned. Abatement is set aside. Application for substitution is allowed. Permission to file special leave petitions is granted.
- 8 December 2023. IA Nos. 5 and 6 of 2012 In view of the developments that seem to have taken place after the filing of these applications in relation to deceased appellant No. 2 in C.A. No. 9531 of 2014, it would be appropriate that the contesting respondents file their replies to these applications. Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, learned coun
- 22 March 2024. IA No. 5/2012 AND IA No. 6/2012 1. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, application seeking permission to bring on record the legal heirs of petitioner no.2, which is pending before the High Court is allowed.
- 17 May 2024. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are duly represented. Appellant has failed to file spare copies for issuance of NLPA to the respondent Nos. 1(i) to 1(vi) and Respondent No.5 in terms of the Order dated 8.10.2014 passed by the Hon'ble Court.
- 23 August 2024. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are duly represented. Certificate of service from the concerned High Court is awaited in respect of Respondent No. 1 (i to vi) & Respondent No. 5.
- 16 October 2024. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1(i to vi) and respondent No.5 but none has entered appearance.
- 27 January 2025. Respondent Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 10 have expired. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellants to take appropriate steps. As per office report, service is complete on respondent Nos. 5 and 7 to 9. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Hemant Sharma, appearing on behalf of Mr.Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate-on
- 27 February 2025. Service is complete on respondent Nos.5 & 7 to 9. Ld. counsel who entered appearance for the said respondents on the last date of hearing, has not filed any vakalatnama or counter affidavit yet. As sought, four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to do so.
- The record also contains 3 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Mr. Arijeet Singh, Mr. Gautam Kumar, Ms. Apurva Upmanuy, Ms. Apurva Upmangu, Ms. Kirti R. Mishra, Ms. Pratima Singh, Mr. S.K. Dey, Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Mr. Amith S.J. Adv., Mr. Krishna Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Ms. Aakanksha Tiwari, Ms. Mangla, Mr. S. Agrawal, Mr. Neeraj S., Ms. Aakanksha, Mr. P. Mishra, Ms. Pratima Singh, Mr. S.K. Dey, Mr. Ashutosh Bansal, Mr. M. S. Mangla
