HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD/HARYANA IV VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. AND ANR. Versus GULSHAN KUMAR AND ORS. ONLY C.A. No. 6879 of 2014 and 7206-7208 of 2014 are to be listed before Hon'ble Judge in Chambers (C.A. 6870/2014)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 6870/2014

Case Record

C.A. 6870/2014

HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD/HARYANA IV VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. AND ANR. Versus GULSHAN KUMAR AND ORS. ONLY C.A. No. 6879 of 2014 and 7206-7208 of 2014 are to be listed before Hon'ble Judge in Chambers

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

109 PDF renditions· 109 distinct judicial orders· 34 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD/HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. Versus GULSHAN KUMAR & ORS.. C.A. 6870/2014 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010096462010. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 34 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 15 October 2015 to 15 July 2026.

On 15 October 2015 the order records: Tag with Civil Appeal No.6870 of 2014. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS
On 16 September 2019 the order records: As per the office report the notices were duly served on the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos. 15 & 21. No one has put appearance on behalf of LRs of deceased Respondent No.6.
On 10 January 2020 the order records: As per postal tracking report, notice issued to respondent Nos. 8,15,16, 22 and 24 could not be served and returned back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for appellants shall, within a period of two weeks', file fresh particulars of the said respondents and shall ta ke requisite steps for the service of notice upon
On 18 March 2024 the order records: IA No. 107830/2022 filed by appellant No. 4 (Jaipal) seeking discharge of Mr. Prem Malhotra, Advocate on Record, stands allowed. M/s. Bakshi & Associates shall replace Mr. Prem Malhotra as Advocate on Record representing appellant No.4 (Jaipal).
On 23 April 2024 the order records: Learned counsel for the respondent(s) contends that the reply which is filed to this application is incomplete. He wishes to file further documents with affidavit. As experienced, we are constrained to observe, during hearing, learned counsel for the parties apprise something, which we do not find on record and then th
On 24 July 2024 the order records: Issue notice on the application for substitution, condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside an abatement, returnable in four weeks. As per office report, there is some error in the name of respondent no. 16 where name of respondent no. 16 is referred to as “Ram Umer” and it ought to have
On 21 March 2025 the order records: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant(s) submits that if some more time is granted, the appellant(s) would take appropriate steps to serve the legal heirs of the deceased respondents and, also to take necessary steps for effecting service in the nature of alternative arrangement. 2. The learned counsel pra
On 15 July 2026 the order records: 1. The present Civil Appeal is of the year 2014 and the office report reflects that Mr. Rishi Malhotra was designated as Senior counsel and an alternative arrangement was required to be done in the matter. In spite of grant of repeated opportunities, the appellant has not taken appropriate steps for making alternative

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

15 October 2015. Tag with Civil Appeal No.6870 of 2014. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS
27 October 2016. As prayed, list after two weeks. (SONALI SAUND ) (RAJINDER KAUR) SR.P.A.
11 October 2018. IA Nos.2-4/2016 in CA No.6871/2014 ; IA Nos.2-4 and 5-7 in CA Nos.6873/2014 and 6879/2014 List the matters after two weeks.
8 April 2019. None appears. List the matters after four weeks.
15 July 2019. As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellants to take fresh steps to serve respondent Nos. 5,8,14 to 16, 22 and 24 and to take steps to bring on record legal representatives of deceased respondent No.17, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed qua aforesaid respondents for non-p
29 July 2019. List after two weeks. (RAJNI MUKHI) (ANJU DUA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
13 August 2019. No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant even on the second call. List after two weeks.
26 August 2019. CA NO. 6871 OF 2014 None appears on behalf of the legal heirs of the deceased sole respondent. Applications for substitution, condonation of delay in filing substitution and setting aside the abatement are allowed. Cause title may be amended accordingly.
16 September 2019. As per the office report the notices were duly served on the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos. 15 & 21. No one has put appearance on behalf of LRs of deceased Respondent No.6.
24 October 2019. None appeared on behalf of the parties. Await certificate of service in respect of Respondent Nos. 5, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17(1) to 17(4), 22 and 24.
10 January 2020. As per postal tracking report, notice issued to respondent Nos. 8,15,16, 22 and 24 could not be served and returned back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for appellants shall, within a period of two weeks', file fresh particulars of the said respondents and shall ta ke requisite steps for the service of notice upon
4 March 2020. Service of notice is complete qua respondent Nos.17(1) to 17(4) but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Two weeks' time, as last chance, is given to learned counsel for petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 10.1.2020 of this Court in respect of respondent Nos. 8, 15, 16, 22 and 24.
20 July 2020. Await service report from the High Court in respect of respondent Nos.8, 15, 16, 22 and 24. Remaining respondents have been served but none has entered appearance.
24 August 2020. Await service report from the High Court in respect of respondent nos. 8,15,16,22 and 24. Issue D.O. letter. Service is complete on the remaining respondents but none has entered appearance.
8 October 2020. Await service report from the High Court in respect of respondent no.24. Issue D.O. letter again. Application filed in respect of deceased respondent nos. 15 and 16 for substitution alongwith an application for condonation of delay, setting aside abatement and exemption from filing official translation be processed as
5 April 2021. As per certificate of service received from High Court, notice in respect of Respondent No.24 has been received back unserved with remarks “could not be traced”. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant(s) to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars for effecting service upon said unser
18 March 2024. IA No. 107830/2022 filed by appellant No. 4 (Jaipal) seeking discharge of Mr. Prem Malhotra, Advocate on Record, stands allowed. M/s. Bakshi & Associates shall replace Mr. Prem Malhotra as Advocate on Record representing appellant No.4 (Jaipal).
23 April 2024. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) contends that the reply which is filed to this application is incomplete. He wishes to file further documents with affidavit. As experienced, we are constrained to observe, during hearing, learned counsel for the parties apprise something, which we do not find on record and then th
14 May 2024. This application is disposed of with an observation that the recovery, if any made, shall be subject to final outcome of the main appeal(s). Hearing of the appeals is expedited.
24 July 2024. Issue notice on the application for substitution, condonation of delay in filing substitution application and setting aside an abatement, returnable in four weeks. As per office report, there is some error in the name of respondent no. 16 where name of respondent no. 16 is referred to as “Ram Umer” and it ought to have
30 August 2024. 6879/2014 Issue notice, returnable in four weeks. Fresh particulars filed within one week in respect of Lrs. of Respondent Nos. 15 (15.1) and 16 (16.3).
4 October 2024. As per office report dated 01.10.2024, counsel for the petitioners have not filed fresh particulars of LRs. of R.Nos.15(15.1) and 16(16.3). Two weeks time is granted to the petitioners for filing fresh particulars in respect of LRs. of R.Nos.15(15.1) and 16(16.3) finally.
25 October 2024. 1. The application is for seeking correction of the name of respondent No.16 (Ram Umer) stands allowed. 2. The steps for service of alternative arrangement notice on respondent Nos.1,13,19 and 20 be taken within three weeks from today.
25 November 2024. 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondents submit that recently she has been instructed to appearing on behalf of respondents and has recently filed Vakalatnama. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners pray for and is granted four weeks time to take steps.
10 February 2025. None appears for the petitioners and also for the respondents. List the matter after four weeks.
21 March 2025. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant(s) submits that if some more time is granted, the appellant(s) would take appropriate steps to serve the legal heirs of the deceased respondents and, also to take necessary steps for effecting service in the nature of alternative arrangement. 2. The learned counsel pra
24 April 2025. List the matter after two weeks.
13 May 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays for and is granted two weeks' time to do the needful and remove the defects, if any, as pointed out by the Registry. 2. List these matters after two weeks.
25 July 2025. Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted four weeks' time to take appropriate steps in respect of Respondent Nos. 1, 13, 19 and 20 and proposed legal representatives nos. 15.1 and 16.3. (LOKESH ARORA) (RAVINDER KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
1 September 2025. At request, issue fresh notice to the respondent No. 18 including dasti. As prayed, four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to take steps to effect service of alternative arrangement notice on respondent nos. 1, 18, 19 and 20.
The record also contains 4 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Nandani Gupta, Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mr. Prem Malhotra, Mr. B.C. Bhatt, Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Mr. Ashish Pandey, Mr. Prateek Rai, Mr. Krishna Kumar, Mr. G. Bhardwaj Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Mr. Rakesh K. Mudgal, Mr. Kailash C. Mudgal, Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Mr. Prem Malhotra, Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Dr. Monika Gusain, Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, Mr. Keshav Mittal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 15 July 2019 the order records: 17, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed qua aforesaid respondents for non-prosecution without referring the matter to the Court.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 15 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 15 Jul 2026

Next hearing

10 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 34 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 56 other files in the folder were left out.