- 10 March 2003. List after service is complete. Fresh steps, if necessary, regarding service of notice be tak en in two weeks. Counter affidavit may be filed in the meantime.
- 25 August 2003. There shall be stay of further proceedings. Charanjit [ OM Prakash ]
- 17 January 2005. Adjourned by three weeks.
- 3 March 2005. The question involved in this appeal is whether the National Remote Sensing Agency is an indus try under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act or not. The similar questions pertain ing to the various departments have been referred to a Constitution Bench, therefore, we think it appropriate that this appeal also
- 7 April 2005. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel started his arguments at 10.40 a.m. and concluded at 2.05 p.m. Thereafter, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, learned senior counsel argued the ma tter for about 10 minutes. Then, Mr. S.K. Dholkiya, learned senior counsel started his argumen ts and concluded at 2.15 p.m. Thereafter, Mr. T.R
- 13 April 2005. Ms. Indira Jaisingh, learned senior counsel resumed her arguments at 10.30 a.m. and conclude d at 11.25 a.m. Thereafter, Mr. Colin Gonsalvase, learned senior counsel started his arguments and concluded at 2.55 p.m. Then, Mr. A.K. Srivastava, learned senior counsel started his argu ments and concluded at 3.10 p.m. There
- 11 January 2017. By concerned application, amendment be carried out within two weeks' time. (JYOTI GUPTA) (MADHU NARULA) SR. P.A.
- 12 October 2023. 1 On the request of Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, the Union of India is impleaded as a party. 2 Issue notice to the newly impleaded party.
- 30 April 2024. List the proceedings in the month of July 2024.
- 16 February 2026. 1. The instant appeals have been referred to a Nine-Judge Bench to consider the correctness of the judgment rendered by a Seven-Judge Bench in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board vs. A. Rajappa, (1978) 2 SCC 213 and concomitantly to also re-consider the interpretation of the expression “industry” as defined in Se
- 18 March 2026. 1. Arguments heard, which remained inconclusive.
- 20 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Singh, Mr. Soli, Mr. Pradeep Malik, Mr. Bhargava V.Desai, Mr. Soli J. Sorabjee, Mr. Preetish Kapoor, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Malik, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Ms. Sheenam Parwanda, Mr. Rakessh Dwivedi, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Bina Madhavan, Mr. Prasanth, Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Mr. S.U.K. Sagar, Mr. L.N. Rao, Mr. R. Santhan Krishnan, Mr. Sateesh Galla, Ms. K. Radha Rani, Mr. A.K. Shriwastava, Mr. M.K. Garg, Mr. Colin Gonsalvase, Ms. Aparna Bhat
