- 8 January 2021. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to produce Insurance Policy. List thereafter.
- 28 October 2021. Issue notice. Until further orders from this Court, there shall be stay of recovery of amount from the Petitioner.
- 5 January 2022. Respondent no.1 in SLP(C) NO.14951/2020, common respondent no.1 in SLP(C) NOS.14950, 14952 OF 2020 and common respondent no.3 are granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Ld. counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of unserved common respondent no.2.
- 17 February 2022. Ld. counsel for respondent no.1(SLP(C) NO.14951/2020) prays for and is granted four weeks' time as final opportunity to file counter affidavit. Common respondent no.1 (SLP(C) NOS.14950, 14952 OF 2020) and common respondent no.3 shall also file counter affidavit within the time as indicated above, as last opportunity.
- 1 April 2022. Ld. counsel appearing for respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.14950,14951 and 14952/2020 submits that they have filed common counter affidavit in the matters, however, the office report incorrectly records that counter affidavit has not been filed by respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.14951/2020. Office shall verify and update the
- 27 September 2022. Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit of dasti service.
- 21 November 2022. Common respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.14950, 14951 and 14952/2020 have filed counter affidavit. Opportunity to respondent No.3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
- 19 October 2023. The matter stands adjourned by a week in terms of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner. (NIDHI AHUJA) (VIRENDER SINGH) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
- 30 July 2024. 1. The dispute between the parties has been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat. 2. Since the matters are not settled in Lok Adalat, list these special leave petitions in the Court.
- 22 April 2026. 1) Leave granted. 2) Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there is judgment 1 of the High Court of Karnataka wherein it is indicated that if fitness certificate is not there, it would not have any impediment in fastening the liability on the insurance company and the findings record
- 19 August 2026. 1. As jointly prayed for, matter be placed before the Special Lok Adalat (Samadhan Samaroh, 2026). 2. The Registry is to immediately take follow-up action.
- 22 August 2026. Parties have settled the matter. Settlement Agreement dated 17.08.2026, duly signed by the parties is placed and taken on CA Nos. 7057-7059/2026 record. Parties have joined through video conferencing and they have been identified by their respective counsel. Even the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Shivam
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Mr. Agam Sharma, Mr. Dharm Singh, Mr Anand Sanjay, Mr Dharm Singh, Ms Nandini Pandey, Mr. Parashuram R. Hattarikihal, Ms. Akhila Wali, Ms. Nandini Pandey, Mr. Nanda Kumar K.B., Mr. Anand Sanjay Advocates — Respondents: Mr Rohit Kumar Sinha, Mr. T. Mahipal, Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, Mr. Rohit Kumar Sinha, Mr. Rohit K. Sinha, Mr. Rohit, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Mrs. Sampa Sengupta Ray, Mr. Indrajeet, Ms. Bharti Verma, Mr. Deva Vrat Anand, Mr. Manan Verma
