- 4 September 2017. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 23 October 2017. Fresh steps be taken/fresh address be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner for service on respondent Nos. 2 & 6 within two weeks' time. Thereafter, notice be issued. Rest of the respondents have been served, but no one has entered appearance.
- 16 January 2018. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.5 and 6 for filing counter affidavit. The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Mohit Gautam, appearing on behalf of Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, Advocate-on-record appears for respondent No.1. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks.
- 23 February 2018. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1, 5 & 6 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 17 April 2018. Service is complete on the respondent Nos.24, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent Nos.1,5 & 6 have failed to file the counter affidavit despite repeated opportunities.
- 26 July 2021. List the matter on 23.08.2021.
- 20 September 2021. Leave granted. The question whether illegitimate children would have a right to the property of their parents, whether self acquired or ancestral, has been referred to a larger Bench in Revanasiddappa & Anr.
- 22 February 2024. The appellant, Godabai Ramu Tippanna, expired on 26.10.2021. It is stated that he left no natural legal heirs. In consequence, respondent No. 5 filed I.A. No. 51474 of 2023 stating to that effect and praying for dismissal of the appeal as abated.
- 9 September 2024. Post after receipt of Inquiry Report. In the meantime, the Registry is directed to send a reminder to the Jurisdictional Court.
- 22 November 2024. The inquiry report forwarded by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ichalkaranji, Kolhapur District records that the respondent-Annaso Siddhappa Choungule is not the legal representative of the deceased Godabai Ramu Tippanna. 2. Let the application filed by such respondent seeking substitution in place of the deceased a
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Dr. Rajeev B. Masodkar, Mr. S. R. Setia, Mr. Rajeev B. Masodkar, Mr. Rajeev B.M. Adv., Mr. Rajiv Masodkar, Mr. Abdul Azeem Kalebudde, Dr. Rajeev Masodkar, Dr. Rajiv Masodkar, Mrs. Taherabi Kalebudde Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mohit Gautam, Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, Ms. Rucha Pravin Mandlik, Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Mr. Sachin Patil, Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Mr. Geo Joseph, Ms. Rucha Pravin Mandlik Adv., Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Haris Ahmad, Dr. Ravindra Chingale
