GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (C.A. 294/2016)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 294/2016

Case Record

C.A. 294/2016

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

30 PDF renditions· 30 distinct judicial orders· 7 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.. C.A. 294/2016 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010224682015. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 7 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 14 July 2016 to 23 August 2026.

On 14 July 2016 the order records: Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the appellant for filing the spare copies of the petition whereafter NLPA shall be issued to the respondents with utmost dispatch. List again on 24.8.2016.
On 24 August 2016 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant has failed to file the spare copies despite opportunities hence NLPA could not be issued. However, I am inclined to grant four more weeks time subject to the condition that he takes steps and deposits a sum of Rs. 1000/- in the Supreme Court Employees Mutual Welfare Fund as cost. If th
On 4 October 2016 the order records: Await certificate of service in respect of the respondent no.4 in both the matters from the concerned High Court. List the matter again on 16.11.2016.
On 16 November 2016 the order records: Issue reminder to the concerned court for certificate of service in respect of the respondent no.4 in both the matters. List again on 02.01.2017.
On 2 January 2017 the order records: Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.4, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the appellant and the respondent Nos.1-3 have not filed the statement of case. However, statement of case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules,2013. Viewed thus, the matters shall be proc
On 30 January 2017 the order records: Pending appeal on the file of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) may be decided but the decision will be subject to outcome of further order in these proceedings.
On 23 August 2026 the order records: 1. The parties have failed to reach an amicable settlement. 2. List the matter(s) before the Regular Court after four weeks.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

14 July 2016. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the appellant for filing the spare copies of the petition whereafter NLPA shall be issued to the respondents with utmost dispatch. List again on 24.8.2016.
24 August 2016. Learned counsel for the appellant has failed to file the spare copies despite opportunities hence NLPA could not be issued. However, I am inclined to grant four more weeks time subject to the condition that he takes steps and deposits a sum of Rs. 1000/- in the Supreme Court Employees Mutual Welfare Fund as cost. If th
4 October 2016. Await certificate of service in respect of the respondent no.4 in both the matters from the concerned High Court. List the matter again on 16.11.2016.
16 November 2016. Issue reminder to the concerned court for certificate of service in respect of the respondent no.4 in both the matters. List again on 02.01.2017.
2 January 2017. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.4, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the appellant and the respondent Nos.1-3 have not filed the statement of case. However, statement of case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules,2013. Viewed thus, the matters shall be proc
30 January 2017. Pending appeal on the file of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) may be decided but the decision will be subject to outcome of further order in these proceedings.
23 August 2026. 1. The parties have failed to reach an amicable settlement. 2. List the matter(s) before the Regular Court after four weeks.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Akarsh Garg, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Ms. Punya Garg, Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury, Mr. P. Chidambaram Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr. Atanu Saikia, Mr. R.S. Nagar, Ms. Shruti Srivastav, Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Mr. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Mr. T.N. Razdan, Mr. Rupesh Kr., Mr. A.K. Kaul, Mr. T.N. Rajdeep, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav

Relief Sought & Granted

On 23 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. The parties have failed to reach an amicable settlement. 2. List the matter(s) before the Regular Court after four weeks.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Aug 2026

Next hearing

23 Aug 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 7 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 5 other files in the folder were left out.