- 6 September 2024. 1. The Bar Council of India (BCI) vide impugned order has rightly held, to the extent that no opinion in relation to the criminal cases pending against the respondent-Advocate ought to be expressed while deciding the statutory complaints. The BCI, however, has imposed the punishment of 'reprimand' on the respondent-Adv
- 8 November 2024. List on 06.01.2025.
- 6 January 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks and is granted four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. 2. Post the matter for hearing on 17.02.2025.
- 17 February 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. We are informed that the trial against the respondent advocate, pursuant to FIR Nos. 94 of 2009 and 96 of 2009 registered with P.S. Madho Nagar, Ujjain under Sections 294, 506, 34 and Sections 395, 397 and 307 of the IPC, respectively is still pending. The above FIRs are reported to have been regi
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Gagan Bajad, Mr. Shankarlal Bajad, Ms. Vanya Gupta, Mr. Asif Ansari, Mr. S. L. Bajad, Mr. C. P. Patidar, Mr. Aish Goyal, Mr. C.p. Patidar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. A. Vinayagam Balan, Mr. Gaurav Pal, Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, Mr. Puneet Thakur, Mrs. Santhanalakshmi
