- 4 September 2025. It is contended that the criminal proceeding is an offshoot of a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the son of the first respondent. It appears that matrimonial proceeding has been transferred from the Court of Civil Judge, Dholpur, Bari, Rajasthan to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
- 13 November 2025. Sole respondent has refused to receive the notice. Hence, service is deemed to be complete on the said respondent through refusal, but none has entered appearance. Let the matters be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 5 January 2026. Though notice appears to have been served on the respondents in both the matters but for the ends of justice, the Court would require fresh service of notice upon the said respondents. 2. Accordingly, let the petitioner take steps for notice through paper publication in respect of the said respondents, in accordance wi
- 18 March 2026. The matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- 25 May 2026. The matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- 14 August 2026. The matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. 2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Manu Padalia, Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Arun Kumar Nagar, Mr. Manohar Naagar, Mr. Ravinder Singh, Mr. Mohit Singh, Mr. Praveen, Mr. Rahul Thukral, Mrs. Rajshree Singh, Mr. Rahul Kasana, Mr. Yash Bhardwaj, Mr. Roop Chaudhary
