- 29 September 2011. Mr. Kaushik Murali, learned counsel appears for the appellants and submits that 1st respondent-Sadbuddhi Brahmesh Wagh, and 7th respondent-Vyankatesh Vinayakrao Wagh- have died. As regards the first respondent, learned counsel submits that his legal representatives are already on record and his name may be deleted. In
- 31 January 2013. Office Report dated 24.01.2013 indicates that counsel for the appellants has not filed Chamber summons in respect of LRs of deceased Respondent No. 9. Learned counsel for the appellants appears today and states that he has already filed the Chamber Summons.
- 29 April 2014. representatives of deceased respondent no. 13(i) is allowed at the risk of the appellants. So far as I.A. No.4 is concerned, issue notice to the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.
- 13 July 2015. Appellant has not yet filed the spare copies. The ld. Counsel has requested four days time. Be filed as assured.
- 2 September 2015. Service report of all the three legal representatives of deceased respondent no.9 is still awaited. List again on 9.10.2015.
- 9 October 2015. All the three legal representatives of deceased respondent no.9 are yet to be served. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps within four weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. List again on 3.12.2015.
- 3 December 2015. The ld. Counsel for the appellant has requested some more time to effect service upon three of the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.9. Appropriate steps be taken within two weeks time. The ld. Counsel has requested for dasti notice. Allowed. Notice be accordingly issued. Signature Not Verified Digitally
- 22 February 2016. Application to bring the LRs. of deceased respondent No.9 on record is allowed. There is no delay in preferring the application.
- 1 July 2016. The ld. Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 6 has no objection to the application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent no.16 but registry has not mentioned the status of the remaining respondents. As such, same shall be mentioned in the next office report. List again on 27.7.2016.
- 27 July 2016. Respondent nos. 2 to 6 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 10 to 15, 17 to 23 despite due service.
- 28 September 2016. Respondent nos. 2 to 6 are duly represented. None appears for respondent nos. 10 to 15,17 to 23 despite due service.
- 30 November 2016. Respondent nos. 1 and 7 have already been deleted from the array of parties. None appears for respondent nos. 10 to 15, 16a and 17 to 23 despite due service.
- 19 January 2017. Respondent nos. 2 to 6 are duly represented. Respondent nos. 1 and 7 have already been deleted from the array of parties.
- 22 February 2017. Respondent nos. 1 and 7 have been deleted vide order dt.29.9.2011. Respondent nos. 2 to 6 are duly represented.
- 7 August 2018. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the lrs. of deceased respondent No.8. Hence, list the same before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent Nos.9(a)-9(c), 16(b) & 16(c) in
- 28 September 2018. Application for substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.8 is allowed. As prayed, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel appearing for the appellants to serve unserved Respondent Nos. 9b, 9c, 16b and 16c.
- 23 January 2019. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that all the unserved respondents have been served. Let proof of service be filed within two weeks.
- 10 May 2024. Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed application for substitution in respect of Respondent No. 23 and also filed proof of service in respect of Respondent Nos.8 (a) to 8 (b), 9 (b) to 9 (c), 13 (ii) to 13 (v), 16 (b), 16 (c) which are defective. Four weeks time is granted to cure the defects. Ld. Counsel for petitioner
- 13 August 2024. Respondent Nos.2 & 4 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed Application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent Nos.3,5,6 and 23 but the same is defective. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted for curing the defects.
- 1 October 2024. Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for appellant seeks and is granted four week's time to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of Respondent Nos.9 (b & c) and 13(ii to v).
- 25 April 2025. Delay in filing the applications for setting aside abatement and substitution is condoned. Abatement is set aside.
- 8 August 2025. Respondent nos.1 and 7 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Court's order dt.29.11.2011. Respondent nos. 2 and 4 are duly represented.
- 18 September 2025. Respondent Nos.1 and 7 have been deleted from the array of parties in terms of Hon'ble Court's order dated 29.11.2011. Respondent Nos.2 and 4 are duly represented.
- 3 November 2025. 1. I.A. No. 228806/2025 seeking deletion of respondent nos. 9 (iii), 13 (ii) and 13 (v) is allowed.
- 8 January 2026. Respondent nos.2 and 4 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an affidavit of dasti service with regard to respondent no.5.2(residing in Canada) stating therein that the said respondent has refused to accept dasti notice. Refusal of dasti cannot be considered as proper service in light of Order L
- 30 January 2026. Respondent Nos.2 & 4 are duly represented. Respondent No.5.2 is residing in Canada. Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars by 06.02.2026 for issuance of NLPA.
- 26 February 2026. Respondent Nos.2 and 4 are duly represented. Respondent Nos.1, 7 & 13.1 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 29.11.2011 and 29.04.2014 respectively.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Kaushik Murali, Mrs Manik Karanjawala, Mr. Abhishek Roy, Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Mr. Dilpreet Singh, Ms Khushboo Bari, Ms Neha Khandelwal, Mr Abhishek Roy, Mr Mandeep Kalra, Mr Abhishek Ray, Mr. Mandeep Kalra, Ms. Nandini Gore Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Mr. Charudatta Mahindrakar, Ms. Rucha Mayee, Mr. Shreyas Mehrotra, Ms Saumya Mehrotra, Ms Soumya Mehrotra, Mr Charudatta Mahindrakar, Ms Vasundra, Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Ms. Saumya Mehrotra, Ms Akriti Dewan
