- 1 September 2023. Delay condoned. Applications for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, official translation and permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures are allowed.
- 16 October 2023. List after two weeks. Registry to verify the service status.
- 1 March 2024. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file reply. 2. List after four weeks.
- 31 July 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 10 December 2024. List the matter after four weeks, as prayed for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on the ground that the arguing counsel is not well. (NISHA KHULBEY) (MAMTA RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 3 February 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent is directed to file counter affidavit within two weeks from today. 2. List the matter after four weeks.
- 25 March 2025. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present revision application has been filed challenging the order passed by the High Court reducing the amount of maintenance from Rs.30,000/- and Rs.20,000/- for the wife and daughter to Rs.20,000/- and Rs.10,000/- respectively, however, the respondent is not
- 23 March 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
- 22 April 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Today, Mr. Raghav Arora, learned counsel, who is appearing on behalf of Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, learned Advocate-on-Record has submitted that he wish to withdraw his appearance for the sole respondent as he has not received any instructions from learned counsel appearing for the s
- 15 May 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Scanned original records of the High Court and the Trial Court have not been received.
- 21 July 2026. As per the office report, sole respondent is duly represented. However, Ms. Muskan Garg, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, learned Advocate-on-Record states that the present counsel engaged by the sole respondent will be withdrawing from further pursuing this matter on behalf of the sole
- 20 August 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. As per the Office report, learned counsel for the sole respondent has not filed application for discharge, as was submitted on the last date of hearing.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Vivek C. Solshe, Mr. Varun V. Solshe, Mr. Anjani Kumar Jha, Mrs. Vivek C. Solshe, Mr. Bacha Babu Mistry, Mr. Amit Balasaheb Thorat, Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Mr. Satote Gajanan Ramkrishana Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, Ms. Rucha Pravin Mandlik, Ms. Harsimran Kaur Rai, Mr. Mohit Gautam, Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Haris Ahmad, Mr. Rishi Didwania, Ms. Rachana S., Mrs. Rucha Pravin Mandlik, Mr. Arjit Mittal, Mr. Raghav Arora, Mr. Paras Dnyaneshwar Bhirud
