- 1 October 2012. Issue notice. Dasti in addition.
- 5 November 2012. A letter is circulated on behalf of the State of Manipur seeking adjournment for filing counter affidavit. The State is allowed time till November 21, 2012 for filing counter affidavit.
- 23 November 2012. Put up on December 6, 2012, as first case subject to overnight part-heard, if any. All parties are directed to complete the pleadings in both the cases latest by December 4, 2012.
- 6 December 2012. Put up on January 04, 2013 at 2.00 p.m. |(Neetu Khajuria) |(Sneh Bala Mehra) | |Sr.P.A. |
- 4 January 2013. We propose to appoint a high powered commission that would tell us the correct facts in regard to the killings of victims in the cases cited by the petitioners. We, accordingly, constitute a three-member commission as under: 1) Mr. Justice N. Santosh Hegde, a former Judge of the Supreme Court of India, as Chairperson 2
- 15 February 2013. This case has been brought up for directions on a mentioning made by Dr. Ashok Dhamija, counsel appearing for the Union of India. ...2/ : 2 :
- 4 March 2013. Two communications are received from the Commission appointed by this Court by order dated January 04, 2013. A) The first is a letter bearing No. 01/SCC/1/2013 signed by the Chairman of the Commission and both its ...2/ : 2 :
- 4 April 2013. The Commission's report dated March 30, 2013 was received in Court on April 2, 2013. We wish to put on record our gratitude for the painstaking work done by the Commission within the time as requested by the Court.
- 9 April 2013. Application to implead Ministry of Defence as one of the respondents is allowed. Mr. Paras Kuhad, learned Additional Solicitor General, stated that the report of Justice Hegde Commission is receiving very serious attention at the highest levels in the Army Headquarters, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Defence and
- 2 July 2013. Copies of the report submitted by the Commission headed by Mr. Justice Santosh Hegde (Retired), have already been furnished to the counsel for the Union of India and learned Amicus.
- 6 August 2013. Pursuant to orders passed by this Court, the reports of the Commission headed by Mr. Justice N. Santosh Hegde (Retired) had been furnished to counsel for all the parties and the parties have also filed their responses. |It has been brought to our notice that on 9th April, 2013 this Court has passed| |orders directing t
- 27 September 2013. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1, let the matter be listed after four weeks.
- 7 February 2014. | | |List these matters for fixing a date of hearing soon after the Constitution | |Bench breaks. | |In the meanwhile pleadings be served on either side including the learned | |Amicus Curiae. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] | |
- 8 August 2014. Let the pleadings be completed within four weeks. Reports, if any, that are still awaited in terms of the earlier orders passed by this Court will be submitted by the concerned Authorities/States within the aforesaid period of four weeks.
- 14 October 2014. Pleadings are complete. Let this matter be listed in the month of February, Signature Not Verified In the meantime, reports, if any, which have not been Digitally signed by Sukhbir Paul Kaur submitted to this Court must be submitted by the parties.
- 27 March 2015. List these matters on 20th April, 2015 at 2.00 p.m. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (INDU POKHRIYAL)
- 13 July 2015. We have heard learned counsel for some time. A chart of 62 cases allegedly of extra judicial executions in Manipur has been filed as Annexure P-2 to the writ petition. These 62 cases relate to more than 62 persons. The exact number of persons is not immediately available but can be gathered from the chart.
- 10 August 2015. List the matters on 5.10.2015 at 2.00pm.
- 5 October 2015. We have been briefly taken through the recommendations made by learned amicus curiae. It appears to us, after hearing learned counsel for the parties, that this case will require a detailed hearing perhaps for two full days.
- 6 October 2015. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list the matter on 4th November, 2015 and 5th November, 2015 at 10.30 a.m.
- 4 November 2015. List the matters on 19th November, 2015 at 10.30AM as part-heard.
- 26 November 2015. Arguments heard in part. List the matter on 3rd December, 2015 at 10.30 a.m. as part-heard matter.
- 3 December 2015. List the matters on 08.12.2015 and 09.12.2015 at 10.30AM as part-heard matters.
- 8 December 2015. We have been given to understand that compensation has not been paid to some of the next of the kin of the deceased inspite of the orders of Gauhati High Court or of the National Human Rights Commission. The justification for that seems to be the pendency of the case before us. We make it clear that compensation should
- 8 December 2015. We have been given to understand that compensation has not been paid to some of the next of the kin of the deceased inspite of the orders of Gauhati High Court or of the National Human Rights Commission. The justification for that seems to be the pendency of the case before us. We make it clear that compensation should
- 8 December 2015. We have been given to understand that compensation has not been paid to some of the next of the kin of the deceased inspite of the orders of Gauhati High Court or of the National Human Rights Commission. The justification for that seems to be the pendency of the case before us. We make it clear that compensation should
- 9 December 2015. In these writ petitions, certain submissions have been attributed to learned Attorney General for India which were not made in the Court and certain observations have also been attributed to this Court, which too were not made. We issue notice to the Sangai Express, through its editor, Rajesh Hijem, the Imphal Free Pre
- 10 December 2015. Arguments heard in part. List the matter tomorrow (11.12.2015) as part-heard matter at 2.00 p.m.
- 11 December 2015. Arguments heard in part. List the matters on 6th and 7th January, 2016 at 10.30 a.m. as part-heard matters.
- 13 January 2016. Learned Attorney General has brought to our notice an article published in The People's Chronicle (English language) and Poknapham (Manipuri language) in which certain highly objectionable statements have been made by one Mr. Babloo Loitongbam who is said to have been present in Court on various dates of hearing of the
- The record also contains 38 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Ms. Svetlana, Ms. Sevtlana C., Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Mr. Shamik Naraya, Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Mr. Shamik Narayan, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Ms. Jubli, Mr. Jubli Mamolia, Mr. Sunil Verma Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Shobha, Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Mr. Atul, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Paras Kuhad, Mr. Ashok Dhamija, Mr. Niraj Kr. Sharma, Ms. Swati Vijayvergiya, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu, Mr. Jitin Chaturvedi, Ms. Swati
