EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY) . AND ORS. FOR 266128/2023 (C.A. 9882/2016)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 9882/2016

Case Record

C.A. 9882/2016

EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY) . AND ORS. FOR 266128/2023

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Education

133 PDF renditions· 133 distinct judicial orders· 24 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SHEETAL GANESH KULKARNI Versus EDUCATION OFFICER & ORS.. C.A. 9882/2016 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010372322013. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 24 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 30 January 2017 to 21 August 2026.

On 30 January 2017 the order records: Heard Mr. Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Makarand D. Adkar, learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that this Court have been passing interim orders for various academic years. We have been commended to the orders passed on 3 rd March
On 6 February 2018 the order records: This is an application for direction. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we think it appropriate that the main matters should be heard expeditiously.
On 23 February 2018 the order records: It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant that interim orders for various academic years have been passed by this Court. On perusal of orders dated 3rd March, 2014, 20th January, 2015 and 30th January,2017, we find that this Court has allowed the petitioner-Institution to follow the existing proce
On 15 March 2019 the order records: IA No.185841 of 2018 in C.A. No.9882/2016 It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant/ applicant(s) that interim orders for various academic years have been passed by this Court. On perusal of orders dated 3 rd March, 2014, 20th January, 2015 and 30 th January, 2017, we find that this Court has allowed the app
On 22 April 2019 the order records: This application has been filed by Union of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development for deletion of its name from the array of parties. It is brought to my notice that Union of India through Human Resource Development was impleaded as party respondent under the order of this Court dated 29-03-3016.
On 30 January 2020 the order records: This application seeks to permit the appellant's school to conduct the screening test for the academic year 202021 as per the existing procedure; and thereafter till the pendency of the case. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant/applicant(s) that interim orders for various academic years have been p
On 30 January 2023 the order records: In view of the orders passed by this Court on earlier occasions, from time to time, this application is allowed, in terms of prayer clause 'a'. The parties are directed to complete the pleadings, within eight weeks from today, in all these appeals/petitions.
On 21 August 2026 the order records: Learned counsel for the respective parties submitted that there is an amicable settlement arrived at between the parties and the appeals could be disposed of in terms of the said settlement. 2. We have perused a copy of the Settlement Agreement.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

30 January 2017. Heard Mr. Amarendra Sharan, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Makarand D. Adkar, learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that this Court have been passing interim orders for various academic years. We have been commended to the orders passed on 3 rd March
7 March 2017. List after Holi vacation.
9 March 2017. Let these matters be listed on 21 st March, 2017. Learned counsel for the parties are requested to file written submissions by that time.
24 March 2017. List these matters again on 12 th April, 2017.
13 April 2017. Let the matter be listed on 20.04.2017.
20 April 2017. Let the matters be listed on 9 th August, 2017. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, it shall be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
9 August 2017. List the matters on 4th October, 2017.
4 October 2017. Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India submits that some time may be granted so that he will be in a position to assist the Court. Let the matter be listed at 2 p.m. on 17 th November, (Chetan Kumar) (H.S. Parasher)
17 November 2017. Heard in part. Put up for further hearing in the second week of February 2018 on a non-miscellaneous day.
6 February 2018. This is an application for direction. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we think it appropriate that the main matters should be heard expeditiously.
22 February 2018. On mentioning, the matter is taken on Board. Let this matter not be deleted from the list.
23 February 2018. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant that interim orders for various academic years have been passed by this Court. On perusal of orders dated 3rd March, 2014, 20th January, 2015 and 30th January,2017, we find that this Court has allowed the petitioner-Institution to follow the existing proce
14 February 2019. IA No. 185841 of 2018 IN C.A. No. 9882/2016 Post this application before the Bench presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde. Liberty is granted to the parties to mention for early listing.
15 March 2019. IA No.185841 of 2018 in C.A. No.9882/2016 It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant/ applicant(s) that interim orders for various academic years have been passed by this Court. On perusal of orders dated 3 rd March, 2014, 20th January, 2015 and 30 th January, 2017, we find that this Court has allowed the app
22 April 2019. This application has been filed by Union of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development for deletion of its name from the array of parties. It is brought to my notice that Union of India through Human Resource Development was impleaded as party respondent under the order of this Court dated 29-03-3016.
7 May 2019. Respondent nos. 1,2 and 4 to 6 are duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
28 January 2020. IA No. 180711/2019 IN C.A. No. 9882/2016 Heard. Order reserved.
30 January 2020. This application seeks to permit the appellant's school to conduct the screening test for the academic year 202021 as per the existing procedure; and thereafter till the pendency of the case. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant/applicant(s) that interim orders for various academic years have been p
1 February 2021. IA No.4966/2021 in C.A. No.9882/2016 For the reasons stated, the instant interlocutory application for direction is allowed and the appellant-school is permitted to conduct the screening test for admission for the academic year 2021-2022 as per the existing procedure.
31 January 2022. The instant interlocutory application for direction is allowed and the appellant-school is permitted to conduct the screening test for admission for the academic year 2022-2023 as per the existing procedure.
30 January 2023. In view of the orders passed by this Court on earlier occasions, from time to time, this application is allowed, in terms of prayer clause 'a'. The parties are directed to complete the pleadings, within eight weeks from today, in all these appeals/petitions.
17 January 2024. IA NO. 266128 OF 2023 IN C.A. No. 9882/2016 List on 02.02.2024.
2 February 2024. IA NO. 266128 OF 2023 IN C.A. NO. 9882 OF 2016 In view of the earlier orders passed by this Court on several occasions, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which is extracted below:
21 August 2026. Learned counsel for the respective parties submitted that there is an amicable settlement arrived at between the parties and the appeals could be disposed of in terms of the said settlement. 2. We have perused a copy of the Settlement Agreement.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Mr. Makarand D. Adkar, Mr. Pravin Satale, Mr. Braj Kishore Mishra, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Mr. Rajender Pd. Saxena, Mr. Amrendra Saran, Mr. Makarand Adkar, Mr. Braj K. Mishra, Mr. Pravin Satala Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Ms. Disha Vaish, Ms. Ayisha M., Mr. Ajay Sharma, Mr. Subhash Acharya, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Mr. Vishal Arun, Mr. Ashish Wad, Mrs. Jayashree Wad, Ms. Paromita Majumdar

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 August 2026 the order records: Consequently, Civil Appeals are disposed of in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 29.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Education

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 21 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 21 Aug 2026

Final disposition

Consequently, Civil Appeals are disposed of in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 29.

Important procedural note

Written only from 24 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 48 other files in the folder were left out.