- 14 August 2017. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that copy of Order dated 09.01.2017 and 29.01.2010 have been filed on Registry to verify and list the matter before Court. (RASHI GUPTA) (MADHU NARULA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 6 November 2017. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 10 January 2018. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have been served but no one has entered appearance. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.3 for filing counter affidavit.
- 16 February 2018. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 2 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 has submitted that they have not received the copy of the pleadings. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to provide copy of the pleadings to the ld. counsel for respondent no.3 within one weeks time.
- 16 November 2020. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 seeking adjournment, list the matter after two weeks.
- 3 January 2023. List the Special Leave Petition on 20 January 2023.
- 20 February 2023. The petitioner was refused the relief of absorption on the ground that the rule on the basis of which the absorption was prayed was repealed in 2003 and was replaced by enactment in 2009. Learned State Counsel accordingly prays for and is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit.
- 29 March 2023. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, the matter is adjourned by four weeks.
- 5 January 2024. Leave granted. The appellant is permitted to file additional documents within four weeks.
- 3 April 2024. Respondent nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
- 8 May 2024. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 is granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit. Whereafter, the matter is to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 12 February 2026. IA No. 303566/2025 No ground to entertain the application for early hearing is made out. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Mrs. Rajmala Dohare, Mr. Dinesh Kr. Tiwari, Mr. Chandan Kumar, Ms. Shama Sharma, Ms. Rajmala Dohare, Mrs Rajmala Dohare, Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Tiwary, Mr. Sarbendra Kumar, Ms. Anita Pandey, Mr. Bhagwat Dayal Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Heena Khan, Ms Wimbie V.T.Sangma, Mr. Gp. Capt. Karan Singh, Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Ms. Monika Sharma, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Alka Sinha, Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Mr. Shiv Autar Singh Sengar, Mr. Dashrath Singh, Mr. Manvendra Singh, Mr. Abhijeet Singh
