DR. INDIRA SARANATH Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AMRISH KUMAR [R-1], [R-2] [ HEARD BY : HON. J.K. MAHESHWARI AND HON. ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. ] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES (C.A. 2536/2011)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2536/2011

Case Record

C.A. 2536/2011

DR. INDIRA SARANATH Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AMRISH KUMAR [R-1], [R-2] [ HEARD BY : HON. J.K. MAHESHWARI AND HON. ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. ] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Service matters

46 PDF renditions· 46 distinct judicial orders· 34 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

DR. INDIRA SARANATH Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.. C.A. 2536/2011 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010117042009. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 34 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 29 November 2012 to 26 May 2026.

On 29 November 2012 the order records: By way of last opportunity, six weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellant to file the statement of case. Respondents may file the statement of case within four weeks thereafter.
On 21 August 2013 the order records: Appellant and respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have filed their respective statement of cases. Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 have been deleted by the order of the Hon'ble Court's Order dated 20.8.2010. Both the counsel submits that no further steps are required.
On 12 October 2023 the order records: At the request of the learned Additional Solicitor General, who states that he may be permitted to call for the records and also peruse the ACRs of the appellant for the period of five years upto the year 2006, the year when the appellant claims to be entitled for promotion from the Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) to
On 29 November 2023 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-Union of India seeks an adjournment on the ground that learned Additional Solicitor General is not in town today. She also seeks time to file copies of the ACRs of the appellant for the period between 2002 to 2006 which was under consideration by the DPC at the relevant time. 2. Ne
On 10 January 2024 the order records: 1. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant states that the affidavit dated 04th December, 2023, filed on behalf of the respondents records in paragraph 3 that the ACR folder of the appellant has been destroyed and is no longer available with the Ministry and only her career card has been m
On 8 May 2024 the order records: 1. In the course of perusing the impugned judgment particularly para 25 thereof which starts from page 34 and ends at page 38, it is brought to our notice that the first sentence at page 36 does not tally with the certified copy of the impugned judgment as available in the file of learned Additional Solicitor General a
On 24 July 2024 the order records: 1. At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list on 31 st July, 2024 high up the Board. 2. In the meantime, learned counsel for the appellant is granted liberty to file list of dates and written submissions, electronically as well, with a copy to the other side.
On 9 April 2026 the order records: 1) Heard. 2) Arguments concluded.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

29 November 2012. By way of last opportunity, six weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellant to file the statement of case. Respondents may file the statement of case within four weeks thereafter.
22 April 2013. Delay in filing the statement of case by the appellant is condoned. |(Jayant Kumar Arora) | |(S.S.R.Krishna) | |Sr. P.A. | |
21 August 2013. Appellant and respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have filed their respective statement of cases. Respondent Nos. 3 to 9 have been deleted by the order of the Hon'ble Court's Order dated 20.8.2010. Both the counsel submits that no further steps are required.
9 December 2021. List after eight weeks.
11 April 2022. List after eight weeks.
21 July 2022. As prayed, list the matter after four weeks. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS
31 May 2023. In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the appellant, list on 12th July, 2023.
12 July 2023. List the matter before a Bench of which one of us (K.V.Viswanathan, J.) is not a member.
2 August 2023. At the request of learned Additional Solicitor General, who states that he may be accommodated for this week, list next week.
9 August 2023. At joint request, list on 23rd August, 2023.
23 August 2023. List on 13th September, 2023.
20 September 2023. List on 5th October, 2023 in the first five matters.
12 October 2023. At the request of the learned Additional Solicitor General, who states that he may be permitted to call for the records and also peruse the ACRs of the appellant for the period of five years upto the year 2006, the year when the appellant claims to be entitled for promotion from the Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) to
29 November 2023. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-Union of India seeks an adjournment on the ground that learned Additional Solicitor General is not in town today. She also seeks time to file copies of the ACRs of the appellant for the period between 2002 to 2006 which was under consideration by the DPC at the relevant time. 2. Ne
10 January 2024. 1. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant states that the affidavit dated 04th December, 2023, filed on behalf of the respondents records in paragraph 3 that the ACR folder of the appellant has been destroyed and is no longer available with the Ministry and only her career card has been m
21 February 2024. 1. Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned ASG, prays for sometime to file affidavit. 2. The same be filed in two weeks.
13 March 2024. At the request of Mr. Vikramji Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondents who states that he is held up before another Bench in the post lunch session, the matter shall not be taken up today, the same shall remain on Board.
14 March 2024. At the request of Mr. Vikramji Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondents who states that he is held up before another Bench, the matter is not being taken up today, list on 20th March, 2024.
3 April 2024. List on 24th April, 2024, high up on the Board.
8 May 2024. 1. In the course of perusing the impugned judgment particularly para 25 thereof which starts from page 34 and ends at page 38, it is brought to our notice that the first sentence at page 36 does not tally with the certified copy of the impugned judgment as available in the file of learned Additional Solicitor General a
24 July 2024. 1. At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list on 31 st July, 2024 high up the Board. 2. In the meantime, learned counsel for the appellant is granted liberty to file list of dates and written submissions, electronically as well, with a copy to the other side.
31 July 2024. As jointly prayed, list the matter on 28.08.2024. (JATINDER KAUR) (NAND KISHOR) P.S. to REGISTRAR
28 August 2024. List in the week commencing from 09th September, 2024.
12 September 2024. Relist the matter in the month of November, 2024.
13 November 2024. 1) List the matter in the week commencing 20 th January, (NIDHI AHUJA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-cum-PS
23 January 2025. On the request made by Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General, list after two weeks. (GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-CUM-PS
23 April 2025. 1. On being mentioned, the matter is taken on Board. 2. List on 31.07.2025.
20 August 2025. List on 21.08.2025.
21 August 2025. 1) List after four weeks.
29 October 2025. List in the month of February, 2026.
The record also contains 4 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Bharat Sangal, Ms. Srijana Lama, Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Ms. R. Rangaswamy, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Ms. Anushree L. Bernard, Ms. Rangoli Seth, Mr. Prateek, Ms. Ayushi Rajput, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Ms. Racheeta Chawla, Ms. Pragya Ganjoo Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Dr. Ranjit Singh, Ms. Rekha Pandey, Ms. Reena Pandey, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Ms. Vaishali Verma, Mr. Suyash Pandey, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Mr. Suyash Pande, Mrs. Priya Mishra, Mr. Padmesh Mishra

Relief Sought & Granted

On 9 April 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1) Heard. 2) Arguments concluded.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Service matters

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 26 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 26 May 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 34 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 12 other files in the folder were left out.