DISCOTONE INDO LTD. XII-B [P-1] Versus CANARA BANK AND ORS. MANOJ K. MISHRA [R-1], S. MODIFICATION PARTIES (C.A. 6041/2015)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 6041/2015

Case Record

C.A. 6041/2015

DISCOTONE INDO LTD. XII-B [P-1] Versus CANARA BANK AND ORS. MANOJ K. MISHRA [R-1], S. MODIFICATION PARTIES

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

51 PDF renditions· 51 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

DISCOTONE INDO LTD. Versus CANARA BANK AND ORS.. C.A. 6041/2015 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010327392009. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 11 May 2016 to 23 August 2026.

On 25 October 2019 the order records: This is an application for early hearing. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, we are inclined to allow the prayer and it is directed that the appeal be listed before the appropriate Bench in the month of January, 2020.
On 28 February 2024 the order records: The matter stands adjourned for the day, on the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
On 29 February 2024 the order records: On the prayer of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, list the matter on 06.03.2024.
On 9 May 2024 the order records: IA No. 69477 of 2024 Issue notice on the application for impleadment. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
On 10 December 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length. 2. Arguments remained unconcluded.
On 11 December 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents both seek a short adjournment to take further instructions in the matter.
On 21 January 2026 the order records: 1. A short adjournment has been sought for since the arguing counsel for the Bank is not available. 2. The matter is released from Part Heard.
On 23 August 2026 the order records: 1. The parties have failed to reach an amicable settlement. 2. List the matter before the Regular Court after four weeks.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

11 May 2016. the main matter.
25 October 2019. This is an application for early hearing. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, we are inclined to allow the prayer and it is directed that the appeal be listed before the appropriate Bench in the month of January, 2020.
23 November 2023. List on 10.01.2024.
28 February 2024. The matter stands adjourned for the day, on the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
29 February 2024. On the prayer of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, list the matter on 06.03.2024.
9 May 2024. IA No. 69477 of 2024 Issue notice on the application for impleadment. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
3 October 2024. Not today.
14 May 2025. IA No. 88721/2025 1. Hearing expedited. 2. IA No. 88721/2025 stands disposed of.
10 December 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length. 2. Arguments remained unconcluded.
11 December 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents both seek a short adjournment to take further instructions in the matter.
17 December 2025. List on 21.01.2026 on top of the Board as part-heard.
21 January 2026. 1. A short adjournment has been sought for since the arguing counsel for the Bank is not available. 2. The matter is released from Part Heard.
23 August 2026. 1. The parties have failed to reach an amicable settlement. 2. List the matter before the Regular Court after four weeks.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. K. K. Mani, Mr. Aravindh S., Mr. Staleen, Mr. A. Arockiaraj, Mr. Apzal Ansari, Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, Mr. S. Aravindh, Mr. M.A. Murthuza Ali, Mr. V.ramasubramanian, Mr. Abbas, Mr. Arockiya Raj, Mr. Arokiya Raj Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Mr. Umesh Dubey, Ms. Vijayashree Patnaik, Ms. Magna Kalra, Mr. S. Mahendran, Mr. Dhruv Nayyar, Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, Mr. Jyoti Mishra, Mr. Sukumar, Ms. Madhulika, Mr. A. Baskar

Relief Sought & Granted

On 23 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. The parties have failed to reach an amicable settlement. 2. List the matter before the Regular Court after four weeks.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Aug 2026

Next hearing

23 Aug 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 27 other files in the folder were left out.