THE DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE MEDICAL SERVICE XI-B AND ANR. [P-2] Versus MEENAKSHI M.V. AND ORS. MOHAMMED SADIQUE T.A. INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT (C.A. 13535/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13535/2024

Case Record

C.A. 13535/2024

THE DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE MEDICAL SERVICE XI-B AND ANR. [P-2] Versus MEENAKSHI M.V. AND ORS. MOHAMMED SADIQUE T.A. INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

19 PDF renditions· 19 distinct judicial orders· 19 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

THE DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE MEDICAL SERVICE & ANR. Versus MEENAKSHI M.V. & ORS.. C.A. 13535/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010252052019. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 19 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 2 August 2019 to 31 July 2026.

On 2 August 2019 the order records: Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief, returnable in four weeks.
On 30 September 2019 the order records: Service is complete on respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.6 to 8 alongwith fresh particulars of respondent No.8 within two weeks.
On 10 January 2020 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars to effect service on respondent nos.6 to 8 within two weeks time. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for taking appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent nos.2 and 12.
On 6 March 2020 the order records: None appeared for respondent no.1 when called. The record shows that service is complete on 18.9.2019 and vakalatnama has been filed on 4.3.2020 however, counter affidavit has not been filed. There is neither written application for extension of time to file pleadings in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules
On 25 March 2021 the order records: The Court is convened through video conferencing. IA No. 31375 of 2020 The application for condonation of delay in filing the application to bring the legal representatives of Respondent No. 2 and 12 on record, is allowed.
On 28 September 2022 the order records: Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 5 and 9 to 11 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
On 16 November 2022 the order records: Opportunity already declined to file counter affidavit in respect of respondent No. 1. Service is complete in respect of respondent Nos. 3 to 6, 9 to 11 and Lrs of deceased respondent Nos. 2 and 12 but none has entered appearance.
On 31 July 2026 the order records: 1. Vide this application, the applicant(s) prays to be impleaded as party respondent to the proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he does not wish to submit any response to the application.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

2 August 2019. Delay condoned. Issue notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief, returnable in four weeks.
6 September 2019. Await service/track report in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 12. List again on 30.9.2019.
30 September 2019. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent Nos.6 to 8 alongwith fresh particulars of respondent No.8 within two weeks.
10 January 2020. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars to effect service on respondent nos.6 to 8 within two weeks time. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for taking appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent nos.2 and 12.
6 March 2020. None appeared for respondent no.1 when called. The record shows that service is complete on 18.9.2019 and vakalatnama has been filed on 4.3.2020 however, counter affidavit has not been filed. There is neither written application for extension of time to file pleadings in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules
24 February 2021. Issue notice to the proposed legal representatives, returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
25 March 2021. The Court is convened through video conferencing. IA No. 31375 of 2020 The application for condonation of delay in filing the application to bring the legal representatives of Respondent No. 2 and 12 on record, is allowed.
28 September 2022. Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 5 and 9 to 11 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
16 November 2022. Opportunity already declined to file counter affidavit in respect of respondent No. 1. Service is complete in respect of respondent Nos. 3 to 6, 9 to 11 and Lrs of deceased respondent Nos. 2 and 12 but none has entered appearance.
4 January 2023. Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service is complete on respondent nos. 3 to 11 and legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 2 and 12 but none has entered appearance.
31 August 2023. This Court finds that there is no good ground to entertain this application. Hence, I.A. No. 185989 of 2022 is rejected. However, it is made clear that no opinion is expressed with regard to the claim of the intervenor.
25 September 2023. Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2(i), 3-11 and 12(i) but none has entered appearance.
16 February 2024. 1. None is present on behalf of the respondents. 2. List on 01st March, 2024.
1 March 2024. List on 23rd April, 2024 (NMD) (POOJA SHARMA) (NAND KISHOR)
23 April 2024. At the request of learned counsel for the respondent that he is held up in post lunch session before another Bench, list in the month of September, 2024 on a non miscellaneous day.
27 November 2024. Leave granted. 2. Hearing be expedited.
2 May 2025. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Despite the service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos.2.1, 3 to 11 and 12.1.
11 November 2025. At the request of the learned counsel, list the matter after two weeks. (SNEHA) (MANOJ KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
31 July 2026. 1. Vide this application, the applicant(s) prays to be impleaded as party respondent to the proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he does not wish to submit any response to the application.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Mr. G. Prakash, Mr. Jishnu M.L., Mrs. Priyanka Prakash, Mrs. Beena Prakash, Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Ms. Beena Prakash, Mr Jishnu M.L., Mrs Priyanka Prakash, Mrs Beena Prakash, Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, Mr. Dileep Poolakkot Advocates — Respondents: Mr Mohammed Sadique T.A, Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A, Mrs. Anu K. Joy, Mr. Alim Anvar, Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.a., Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, Mr Alim Anvar, Ms. Anu. K. Joy, Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., Ms. Anu K. Joy, Mr. Alam Anvar, Mr. Abraham Mathew

Relief Sought & Granted

On 25 March 2021 the order records: 16909 of 2019 The application for substitution filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, is allowed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 31 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 31 Jul 2026

Next hearing

11 Nov 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 19 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.