- 21 March 2018. Sole respondent is duly represented. Statement of case has not been filed and time has expired.
- 20 August 2018. List the matter after four weeks.
- 27 September 2018. It seems there is a dispute between the learned counsel as to who is appearing on behalf of the appellant. The same cannot be resolved in the Court and they have to sought it out outside the court. List the matter after two weeks.
- 31 October 2018. In view of the No Objection Certificate filed by the previous Advocate-on-Record for the appellants, the application for discharge of Advocate-on-Record is allowed. The vakatlatnama of Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathi, Advocate-on Record is accepted.
- 6 May 2019. Let the application be listed along with the main matter.
- 14 March 2024. 1. Heard in part. 2. To enable Mr. Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellants, obtain instructions on the proposal given by Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the respondent that he is willing to pay him Rs.5 lakh to bring about a closure of the inter-se disputes, the appeal may be re-listed after three weeks subject to
- 24 April 2026. 1. For the reasons assigned in the applications, duly supported by an affidavit, the applications seeking setting aside abatement and substitution are allowed. 2. Let the amended cause title be filed accordingly.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Sujata Kurdukar, Mr. Alakh Alok Srivastava, Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh, Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Mr. Nilakanta Nayak, Mr. Shishir Deshpande, Mr. Alakh Alak Srivastava, Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Dr. Alakh Alok Srivastava Advocates — Respondents: Ms Veena Rattan, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Ms. Priyal Jain, Mr. Harsh Jain, Mr. Puneet Jain, Ms. Christi Jain, Ms. Ankita Gupta, Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Mrs. Christi Jain, Mr. Mann Arora, Ms. Akriti Sharma, Ms. Lisha Bhati
