- 7 May 2018. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the Petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by the Registry, failing which the special leave petition shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.
- 2 July 2018. Delay condoned. Though we are inclined to agree with the reasonings assigned by the High Court in the impugned order but having regard to the nature of controversy involved in the case, we feel just and proper to convert this special leave petition treating it to have arisen out of the order passed by this Court in Spe
- 10 September 2018. List the matter tomorrow i.e. 11th September, 2018.
- 11 September 2018. Let the matter be listed for further orders as soon as the respondents are served because as per the office noting of the Registry, the report of the notice sent to the respondents is still awaited.
- 3 December 2018. Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time, to file counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for effecting service upon respondent No.2 within two weeks.
- 1 February 2019. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent No.1 to file counter affidavit. Service is complete qua respondent No.1 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
- 23 November 2022. List in the second week of January, 2023.
- 9 January 2023. As prayed, list after two weeks, to enable the respondent to file counter affidavit.
- 28 March 2023. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment, the matter stands adjourned by two weeks.
- 3 November 2023. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for filing rejoinder affidavit, hearing of this matter is deferred for two weeks.
- 22 March 2024. List on 15.04.2024.
- 15 April 2024. Leave granted.
- 20 August 2024. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent no.2, but none has entered appearance.
- 19 September 2025. 1. Leave is granted to the appellant to implead State of Maharashtra through Education Officer, Zila Parishad Nagpur as party respondent. 2. Amendment memo of parties be filed forthwith.
- 10 December 2025. 1. No urgency in the matter. 2. List as per turn.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Joydeep Mukherjee, Mr. Kishore Lambat, Mr. Sachin Pahwa, Mr. Kishor Lambat, Ms. Krishma Lambat, Mr. Kishor Ram Lambat, Ms. Kashmira Lambat, Mr. Milind Vaishnav, Ms. Reshma Lalwani, Ms. Suja Joshi, Mr. Prem Mankani, Mr. Sagar Lambat Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Ms. Astha Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Manchanda, Ms. Kajal Dalal, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Mr. Satya Kam Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Mr. Abhinav K.mutyalwar, Mr. Gajanan N. Tirthkar, Mr. Satyajit, Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar
