- 14 October 2024. 1. Permission to file the TP is granted. 2. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks.
- 2 January 2025. Service is complete on respondent No.1 but none has entered appearance. Notice sent for service on respondent Nos.2 to 5 has been received back with the remarks “unclaimed”. Hence, service is deemed to be complete on the said respondents in light of Judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in K.
- 13 February 2025. 1. Though served, none has entered appearance. 2. Dasti notice, in addition is permitted.
- 16 April 2025. Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. As per office report, service is not complete on respondent Nos.2 to 5. Ld. Advocate, Mr. Gir Raj Singh Yadav, appearing on behalf of Ms. Neha Malik, Advocate-on record has entered appearance for respondent Nos.2 to 5 and has submitted that vakal
- 15 July 2025. Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.
- 18 September 2025. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are agreeable for referring the matter(s) to mediation for exploring the possibility of a settlement. We hereby refer the dispute to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for initiation, conduct and 1 of 2 conclusion of the mediation proceedings. 2. The First meeting f
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Jose Abraham, Dr. Arpit Lal, Mr. Anto Robert, Mr. Anto Robert G., Ms. Harshil Maheshwari, Mr. G. Anto Robert, Dr. Sebastian Joseph, Mr. Anto, Mr. Basil Jaison, Ms. Sarah Shaji Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Baij Nath Patel, Ms. Mandavi Pandey, Mr. Vikas Tripathi, Mr. Shivam Tiwari, Mr. Chandan, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Mishra, Mr. Jai Narang, Ms. Sherya Pandey, Ms. Damini Vishwakarma, Ms. Neha Malik, Mr. S.D Sanjay
