DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/S PRABHU STRUCTURES LTD FOR PRE FINAL HEARING (C.A. 3686/2015)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3686/2015

Case Record

C.A. 3686/2015

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/S PRABHU STRUCTURES LTD FOR PRE FINAL HEARING

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI · HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

31 PDF renditions· 31 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/S PRABHU STRUCTURES LTD. C.A. 3686/2015 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010067302014. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 5 July 2016 to 22 August 2026.

On 17 August 2016 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellant shall file the deficit court fee within a period of four weeks. Await certificate of service in respect of the s ole respondent.
On 28 September 2016 the order records: Ld.counsel for the appellant has filed the deficit court fee. Ld.counsel for the parties may file the statement of case within the statutory period. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules after expiry of that period.
On 3 January 2019 the order records: Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of the sole respondent. Reminder be issued. Statement of case has not been filed and time has expired.
On 11 April 2019 the order records: Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. Affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee has been filed.
On 10 May 2019 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee has been filed.
On 9 February 2023 the order records: Office report not received. Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance.
On 20 January 2026 the order records: Counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent has already been filed. Process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
On 22 August 2026 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the parties states that the matters have been settled between the parties. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeks and is permitted to withdraw the present appeals.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

5 July 2016. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
17 August 2016. Ld. Counsel for the appellant shall file the deficit court fee within a period of four weeks. Await certificate of service in respect of the s ole respondent.
28 September 2016. Ld.counsel for the appellant has filed the deficit court fee. Ld.counsel for the parties may file the statement of case within the statutory period. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules after expiry of that period.
23 February 2017. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
8 October 2018. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
3 January 2019. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of the sole respondent. Reminder be issued. Statement of case has not been filed and time has expired.
18 February 2019. Await certificate of service from the High Court in respect of the sole respondent. Reminder be issued. Affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee have been filed.
11 April 2019. Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. Affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee has been filed.
10 May 2019. Sole respondent is duly represented. Affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee has been filed.
9 February 2023. Office report not received. Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance.
20 January 2026. Counter affidavit on behalf of sole respondent has already been filed. Process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
21 August 2026. List on 22.08.2026 (Samadhan Samaroh). (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
22 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the parties states that the matters have been settled between the parties. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeks and is permitted to withdraw the present appeals.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Ms. Chanan Parwani, Mr. Ajay Sharma, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Ms. Ragini Singh, Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Mr. T.M. Singh, Mr. Anup Kumar, Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Mr. H.R. Rao, Ms. Akansha Kaul, Mr A.K.Kaul Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Neha Agarwal, Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Ms Neha Agarwal, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Alok Yadav, Ms. Sayaree Basu Mullick, Mr. Abhinabh Garg, Ms. Kamakshi Sehgal, Mr. Maj. Nirvikar Singh, Mr. Paranjai Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 22 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Learned counsel for the parties states that the matters have been settled between the parties. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeks and is permitted to withdraw the present appeals.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 22 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 22 Aug 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 5 other files in the folder were left out.