THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANR. XIV-A MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA Versus TIPAK TAYENG HRISHIKESH BARUAH [R-1] (C.A. 231/2017)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 231/2017

Case Record

C.A. 231/2017

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANR. XIV-A MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA Versus TIPAK TAYENG HRISHIKESH BARUAH [R-1]

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Delay

53 PDF renditions· 53 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & ANR. Versus TIPAK TAYENG. C.A. 231/2017 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010115082016. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 5 January 2018 to 24 April 2026.

On 5 January 2018 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Statement of case be filed within the stipulate period by the parties.
On 19 March 2021 the order records: Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Issue notice on the prayer for stay, application for condonation of delay and on the Special Leave Petition.
On 12 November 2021 the order records: This application be heard alongwith appeal as jointly requested in view of the urgency involved. Hearing of the appeal is expedited.
On 6 January 2022 the order records: Four weeks time, as a last chance is granted to all the respondents to file the counter affidavit. After the expiry of four weeks, matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per the rules.
On 12 December 2022 the order records: 1 List the Civil Appeal in the second week of April 2023 before the appropriate Bench. 2 The Interlocutory Application for early hearing is disposed of.
On 12 April 2023 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of the learned Senior Counsel. List the matter after six weeks.
On 22 February 2024 the order records: List the matter on 24.04.2024. (NISHA KHULBEY) (PREETHI T.C.) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
On 24 April 2026 the order records: IA No. 63986/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 07.12.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA stands disposed of accordingly.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

5 January 2018. Sole respondent is duly represented. Statement of case be filed within the stipulate period by the parties.
19 March 2021. Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Issue notice on the prayer for stay, application for condonation of delay and on the Special Leave Petition.
12 November 2021. This application be heard alongwith appeal as jointly requested in view of the urgency involved. Hearing of the appeal is expedited.
6 January 2022. Four weeks time, as a last chance is granted to all the respondents to file the counter affidavit. After the expiry of four weeks, matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per the rules.
6 December 2022. List the application for early hearing on 12 December 2022.
12 December 2022. 1 List the Civil Appeal in the second week of April 2023 before the appropriate Bench. 2 The Interlocutory Application for early hearing is disposed of.
12 April 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks adjournment on the ground of nonavailability of the learned Senior Counsel. List the matter after six weeks.
21 September 2023. List on 01.11.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
22 February 2024. List the matter on 24.04.2024. (NISHA KHULBEY) (PREETHI T.C.) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
7 November 2024. List on 22.01.2025.
24 April 2025. List the I.A. along with Civil Appeal on 31.07.2025.
18 September 2025. List on 30.10.2025.
24 April 2026. IA No. 63986/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 07.12.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA stands disposed of accordingly.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Ms. Vimla Sinha, Ms. Meenakshi Grover, Mr. Vipul Sundriyal, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Mr. R. Balasubramaniam, Mr. Santosh Kumar, Ms. Noor Rampal, Mr. Raghvendra S. Srivatsa Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Ms. Radhika Gupta, Mr. Shyam Divan, Ms. Apoorva Jain, Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, Mr. Apoorva Jain, Mr. Deep Pal Singh Alag, Mr. Kumar Kshitij, Ms. Eliza Bar, Mr. Huzefa A.Ahmadi, Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Mr. Utkarsh Dwivedi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 April 2026 the latest order on this record says: IA No. 63986/2026 1. List the appeal for hearing in the week commencing 07.12.2026 before an appropriate Bench. 2. IA stands disposed of accordingly.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Apr 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Apr 2026

Next hearing

24 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 16 other files in the folder were left out.