DELHI BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION Versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) (C.A. 10620/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 10620/2025

Case Record

C.A. 10620/2025

DELHI BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION Versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)

MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

21 PDF renditions· 21 distinct judicial orders· 21 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

DELHI BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD Versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION). C.A. 10620/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010329972017. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 21 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 16 March 2018 to 11 August 2026.

On 16 March 2018 the order records: None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Four weeks' time, as a last opportunity, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry, failing which the Special Leave Petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
On 5 November 2024 the order records: 1. Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General is appearing on behalf of Delhi Building and Other construction Workers Welfare Board, is a statutory body under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. We consider it appropriate that he
On 5 August 2025 the order records: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Leave granted.
On 22 September 2025 the order records: Counter affidavit is already filed on behalf of sole respondent. Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to file Affidavit of valuation alongwith ad-valorem Court fee.
On 12 November 2025 the order records: Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of sole respondent. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit of valuation alongwith ad-valorem Court fee.
On 5 January 2026 the order records: Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the appellant has not filed affidavit of valuation alongwith ad valorem court fee, despite the grant of last opportunity.
On 6 May 2026 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant stated that since he has entered appearance recently in place of earlier learned counsel, four weeks' time be granted within which, the appellant shall pay the necessary ad valorem court fee. Four weeks' time is granted, within which the ad valorem court fee shall be invariably paid.
On 11 August 2026 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed Affidavit of Valuation alongwith Ad-valorem Court fee.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

16 March 2018. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Four weeks' time, as a last opportunity, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry, failing which the Special Leave Petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
24 April 2018. Delay condoned. (SHASHI SAREEN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER
11 May 2018. Issue notice. (SHASHI SAREEN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER
26 July 2018. Sole respondent is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 31.8.2018.
27 September 2018. Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. The matter stands complete.
25 January 2024. List on 19.02.2024.
19 February 2024. Matters stand adjourned by two weeks.
7 March 2024. List for disposal on 14.05.2024. Written submission be filed in the meanwhile.
10 July 2024. List for final disposal on 15.10.2024 at 2 p.m.
18 October 2024. List for final disposal on 05.11.2024 at 2.00P.M.. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
5 November 2024. 1. Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General is appearing on behalf of Delhi Building and Other construction Workers Welfare Board, is a statutory body under the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. We consider it appropriate that he
5 December 2024. List in the month of March, 2025. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
7 March 2025. Not taken up. List after Holi Vacation, 2025.
4 April 2025. List for final disposal on 22.07.2025 at 2.00P.M.. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
29 July 2025. 1. Not taken up. 2. List on 05.08.2025.
5 August 2025. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Leave granted.
22 September 2025. Counter affidavit is already filed on behalf of sole respondent. Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to file Affidavit of valuation alongwith ad-valorem Court fee.
12 November 2025. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of sole respondent. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to file affidavit of valuation alongwith ad-valorem Court fee.
5 January 2026. Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the appellant has not filed affidavit of valuation alongwith ad valorem court fee, despite the grant of last opportunity.
6 May 2026. Learned counsel for the appellant stated that since he has entered appearance recently in place of earlier learned counsel, four weeks' time be granted within which, the appellant shall pay the necessary ad valorem court fee. Four weeks' time is granted, within which the ad valorem court fee shall be invariably paid.
11 August 2026. Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed Affidavit of Valuation alongwith Ad-valorem Court fee.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Ms. Shruti Agarwal, Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, Mr. Rohit Rao, Ms. Devahuti Tamuli, Mr. Santosh Prasad Chaursiya, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. Vikramjeet Bannerjee, Mr. M. K. Maroria, Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Mr. S.K. Singhania Advocates — Respondents: Mr Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Ms. S. Usha Reddy, Mr. Vikramjit Bannejee, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. Siddharth Sinha, Mr. Shruti Agarwal, Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhnia, Mrs. Gayatri Misra, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Satya Jha, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Maroria

Relief Sought & Granted

On 16 March 2018 the order records: Four weeks' time, as a last opportunity, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry, failing which the Special Leave Petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 11 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 11 Aug 2026

Next hearing

22 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 21 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.