- 11 May 2015. Four LRs of sole respondent have duly been served. Appellants have already filed the statement of case but the respondent has not filed the same. Time stipulated for the purpose has expired. Otherwise also after the amendment in Supreme Court Rules, 2013, it is no more a mandate. Chronology of events already on record
- 18 December 2019. Ld. Counsel for the appellant expired, as such, registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders.
- 6 January 2020. Await service on appellants no. 2, 3(i) to 3(iv) and 6. It is submitted that the counsel who appeared for respondent nos. 1 to 4 has also expired. Steps be taken for representation on behalf of respondents and file fresh vakalatnama on behalf of respondents. Four weeks' time is granted to do the needful.
- 7 February 2020. As prayed, further four weeks' time is granted to do the needful. list the matter after four weeks.
- 23 June 2020. Office report indicates that notice for making alternative arrangements were served upon 1(i) to 1(iv). In terms of the office report, the tracking report shows that the notices were duly delivered.
- 21 August 2026. 1. The parties are connected through video conferencing. 2. We have examined the material placed before us, which includes the Report of the Mediator dated 18th May, 2026, according to which, the parties have settled their disputes. The appellant-tenant has handed over the vacant possession of the shop, in question, (S
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shish Pal Laler, Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Mr. Sonit Sinhmar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad, Mr. Siddharth Jain, Mr. Umang Shankar
