COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) MUMBAI Versus M/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCEL LIMITED) [IA NO. 199486/25 IN CA NO. 8512/2012 IS LISTED UNDER (C.A. 4831/2009)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 4831/2009

Case Record

C.A. 4831/2009

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) MUMBAI Versus M/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCEL LIMITED) [IA NO. 199486/25 IN CA NO. 8512/2012 IS LISTED UNDER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

35 PDF renditions· 35 distinct judicial orders· 19 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RT NO.12 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.4831/2009 COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) MUMBAI Versus M/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCEL LIMITED). C.A. 4831/2009 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010105962009. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 19 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 16 September 2009 to 8 July 2026.

On 6 January 2010 the order records: Respondent is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 22.2.2010.
On 29 April 2011 the order records: The ld. Counsel for the appellant is present. He is directed to file the statement of case within a period of 45 days.The ld. Counsel shall provide a copy of the statement of case to the ld. Counsel for the respondents against proper acknowledgment immediately after he files the same and the ld. Counsel for the respond
On 7 September 2012 the order records: 1. Appeals admitted. 2. Mr.A.K.Sharma, learned counsel appears and takes notice on behalf of the respondent.
On 9 September 2014 the order records: Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel, Mr Ajay Singh, appearing on behalf of Mr B.K.Prasad, Advocate-on-record, for filing their vakalatnama on behalf of the sole respondent. List again on 28.10.2014.
On 4 November 2020 the order records: IA No. 109166/2020 in C.A. No. 5860/2019 Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry vs. ACER India Ltd., reported in 2004 (8) SCC 173. Counsel for the respondent prays for t
On 9 September 2025 the order records: 1. The learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that this appeal has been wrongly tagged with Civil Appeal No.4831/2009 inasmuch as the issues are different. 2. In view of the above, this appeal shall be detagged from Civil Appeal No.4831/2009.
On 11 March 2026 the order records: 11078-11083/2018, C.A. No. 5863/2019 and C.A. No. 5860/2019 1. Admitted. 2. List for hearing on 18.03.2026.
On 8 July 2026 the order records: 1. There is a letter seeking adjournment circulated on behalf of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. List after three weeks.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

16 September 2009. Await service. List again on 10.11.2009.
10 November 2009. Await service. List again on 6.1.2010.
6 January 2010. Respondent is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 22.2.2010.
22 February 2010. File not received. List again on 10.3.2010.
30 March 2010. Sole respondent to file counter affidavit, if any, within four weeks, as last chance. List again on 12th May, 2010.
12 May 2010. Though sufficient time has been granted till date, no further time can be granted for filing counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
29 April 2011. The ld. Counsel for the appellant is present. He is directed to file the statement of case within a period of 45 days.The ld. Counsel shall provide a copy of the statement of case to the ld. Counsel for the respondents against proper acknowledgment immediately after he files the same and the ld. Counsel for the respond
7 September 2012. 1. Appeals admitted. 2. Mr.A.K.Sharma, learned counsel appears and takes notice on behalf of the respondent.
10 January 2013. Perused the office report dated 18.10.2012. The respondent is allowed eight weeks' time to file the statement of case. If the needful is not done then he shall not be entitled to file the statement of case in future.
9 September 2014. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel, Mr Ajay Singh, appearing on behalf of Mr B.K.Prasad, Advocate-on-record, for filing their vakalatnama on behalf of the sole respondent. List again on 28.10.2014.
10 May 2018. File not received. List again on 01.08.2018.
19 July 2019. List in the month of October, 2019, before appropriate Bench. Application for early hearing is disposed of.
5 August 2019. The appeals are admitted. To be heard along with Civil Appeal Nos.4831/2009, 5989-5990/2012, 5368/2016 and other connected cases, if any.
4 November 2020. IA No. 109166/2020 in C.A. No. 5860/2019 Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry vs. ACER India Ltd., reported in 2004 (8) SCC 173. Counsel for the respondent prays for t
17 November 2020. List the matters after two weeks. Interim order to continue till then.
9 September 2025. 1. The learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that this appeal has been wrongly tagged with Civil Appeal No.4831/2009 inasmuch as the issues are different. 2. In view of the above, this appeal shall be detagged from Civil Appeal No.4831/2009.
19 January 2026. List on 11.03.2026.
11 March 2026. 11078-11083/2018, C.A. No. 5863/2019 and C.A. No. 5860/2019 1. Admitted. 2. List for hearing on 18.03.2026.
8 July 2026. 1. There is a letter seeking adjournment circulated on behalf of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. List after three weeks.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms Anjani Aiyagari, Mrs Anil Katiyar, Ms. Prachi Bajpai, Mr Y.P.Mahajan, Ms. Shweta Verma, Mr. Shukla, Mr. Anilendra Pandey, Mr. Om Prakash, Mr Naik H.K., Ms. Gunwant Dara, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr Prashanth Shivdass Advocates — Respondents: Mr. M.P. Devanath, Mr. M.P.Devanath, Mr Prashanth Shivdass, Mr. M. P. Devanath, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Ms. Mansa Singh, Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Udit Naresh, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Mrs. Anil Katiyar

Relief Sought & Granted

On 9 September 2025 the order records: In view of the above, this appeal shall be detagged from Civil Appeal No.4831/2009. 3. IA No. 199486/2025 stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 8 Jul 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 8 Jul 2026

Next hearing

9 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 19 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 8 other files in the folder were left out.