COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAX RAJKOT Versus NARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. [HEARD BY: HON. PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA AND HON. ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES (C.A. 3405/2012)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3405/2012

Case Record

C.A. 3405/2012

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAX RAJKOT Versus NARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. [HEARD BY: HON. PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA AND HON. ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.] [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

C.A.Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

13 PDF renditions· 13 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAX RAJKOT Versus NARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . & ORS.. C.A. 3405/2012 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010058392012. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 27 November 2012 to 2 December 2025.

On 27 November 2012 the order records: Respondent No.2 has been served. Granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 3. List the matter on 22.01.2013.
On 22 January 2013 the order records: Respondent No 1 and 3 have filed Vakalatnma. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. No appearance for respondent No. 2. List the matter on 7.3.2013.
On 7 March 2013 the order records: Respondent No. 1 and 3 granted three more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 30.4.2013.
On 30 April 2013 the order records: Service is complete. Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit even now. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
On 4 July 2018 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. Statement of case has been filed by the appellant.
On 7 August 2018 the order records: Affidavit of valuation and deficit court fee has been filed. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
On 4 January 2019 the order records: This is an application for early hearing of the appeals. Let the appeals be listed in the month of March, 2019 before the appropriate Bench.
On 18 September 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Hearing concluded.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

27 November 2012. Respondent No.2 has been served. Granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1 & 3. List the matter on 22.01.2013.
22 January 2013. Respondent No 1 and 3 have filed Vakalatnma. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. No appearance for respondent No. 2. List the matter on 7.3.2013.
7 March 2013. Respondent No. 1 and 3 granted three more weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 30.4.2013.
30 April 2013. Service is complete. Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 have filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.2 has not filed counter affidavit even now. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
26 July 2013. Appeals are admitted. |(Rajni Mukhi) | |(Sneh Bala Mehra) | |SR. P.A. | |
4 July 2018. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. Statement of case has been filed by the appellant.
7 August 2018. Affidavit of valuation and deficit court fee has been filed. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
4 January 2019. This is an application for early hearing of the appeals. Let the appeals be listed in the month of March, 2019 before the appropriate Bench.
7 August 2025. Not today. (NISHA KHULBEY) (NIDHI WASON) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
18 September 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Hearing concluded.
2 December 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
2 December 2025. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. S.A. Zaidi, Mr. Pramod Ksr. Dubey, Mr. Rohit Gupta, Mr. R.P. Bhatt, Mr. Abhinav M., Mr. Angad Kochhar, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr. Mohd. Hussain, Mr Mohd. Hussain, Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Mr. Raghavendra Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Jyoti Gupta, Mr. Nikhil Jain, Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Mr. S. Sunil, Mr. Parthiv K. Goswami, Ms. Palak Mahajan, Mr. Ishan Bisht, Mr. Ashish Batra, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Mr. Wattan Sharma, Mr Rattan Sharma, Ms. Divya Jain

Relief Sought & Granted

On 18 September 2025 the latest order on this record says: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Hearing concluded.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Speed up proceedings Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 2 Dec 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 2 Dec 2025

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.