COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. Versus ST. GEORGE EDUCATIONAL TRUST ONLY CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3885 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3889/2019 ARE TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE ON RECORD (C.A. 3885/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3885/2019

Case Record

C.A. 3885/2019

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. Versus ST. GEORGE EDUCATIONAL TRUST ONLY CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3885 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3889/2019 ARE TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE ON RECORD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Education Taxation

74 PDF renditions· 74 distinct judicial orders· 21 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Versus ST. GEORGE EDUCATIONAL TRUST. C.A. 3885/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010016672013. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 21 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 5 September 2017 to 24 August 2026.

On 5 September 2017 the order records: Sole respondent has been served, but none has entered appearance. Learned advocate Mr. Akshat Malpani appearing on behalf of Mr.
On 11 October 2017 the order records: category matters. Last and final opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners for taking fresh steps for service on the sole respondent in SLP(C) Nos. 37568/2013 and 26120/2016 within two weeks' time. Thereafter, notice be issued.
On 16 November 2017 the order records: Sole respondent has been served but no one has put in appearance. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules, however, alongwith the connected matters as and when become ready.
On 15 July 2019 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copy for issuance of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal to the High Court. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is directed to file spare copy within two weeks time else cost will be imposed in terms of Order V, Rule 1(29), Supreme Court Rules 2013. If filed, process as
On 21 October 2019 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee.
On 29 January 2020 the order records: 3893 of 2019 Sole respondent is duly served/represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee in respective matters.
On 22 March 2022 the order records: Sole respondent in C.A. No.3885, 3886 and 3888 of 2019 is duly represented. Service is complete on the sole respondent in C.A.
On 24 August 2026 the order records: 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. Time of three weeks is granted to learned counsel for the appellants to take fresh steps to serve the unserved sole respondent.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

5 September 2017. Sole respondent has been served, but none has entered appearance. Learned advocate Mr. Akshat Malpani appearing on behalf of Mr.
11 October 2017. category matters. Last and final opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners for taking fresh steps for service on the sole respondent in SLP(C) Nos. 37568/2013 and 26120/2016 within two weeks' time. Thereafter, notice be issued.
16 November 2017. Sole respondent has been served but no one has put in appearance. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules, however, alongwith the connected matters as and when become ready.
6 February 2018. Three weeks' time is granted, as a last opportunity, to the petitioner(s) to do the needful.
26 March 2018. Await service/track report in respect of the sole respondent. List again on 10.4.2018.
10 April 2018. Service is complete on the sole respondent but none has entered appearance. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
1 March 2019. List the Special Leave Petitions after four weeks on a non-miscellaneous day. Counter affidavits, if any, shall be filed in the meantime.
9 April 2019. Leave granted.
15 July 2019. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copy for issuance of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal to the High Court. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is directed to file spare copy within two weeks time else cost will be imposed in terms of Order V, Rule 1(29), Supreme Court Rules 2013. If filed, process as
21 October 2019. Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee.
29 January 2020. 3893 of 2019 Sole respondent is duly served/represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing affidavit of valuation and ad valorem court fee in respective matters.
22 March 2022. Sole respondent in C.A. No.3885, 3886 and 3888 of 2019 is duly represented. Service is complete on the sole respondent in C.A.
9 November 2022. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant(s) for curing the defects.
12 September 2023. None appears for the appellant even on the second call. List the matter after two weeks.
6 October 2023. Mr. Vikrant Yadav, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant, seeks some more time to take steps, in terms of the Office Report dated 23.09.2023. Needful shall be done, without fail, within four weeks.
2 May 2025. Registry is directed to get the letter received through email, translated in English and list again after two weeks. (GEETA JOSHI) (PREETI SAXENA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
1 August 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted six weeks' time to take necessary steps in the matter. 2. List thereafter.
13 March 2026. Perused the interlocutory application. The learned counsel, Ms. Shweta Garg representing the sole respondent stands discharged in view of statements made therein. 2. The interlocutory application stand disposed of.
17 April 2026. Since service of alternative arrangement notice is complete on the sole respondent, the matter be processed in accordance with the Rules. Time of three weeks is granted to take necessary steps to serve the unserved sole respondent.
22 May 2026. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant is granted four weeks' time to take steps regarding unserved sole respondent. (MOHD IBRAHIM) (POOJA KOHLI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
24 August 2026. 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. Time of three weeks is granted to learned counsel for the appellants to take fresh steps to serve the unserved sole respondent.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mrs. Prema Singh, Mr. Acharya Santosh Prasad Chaursiya, Ms. Gargi Khanna, Mrs Mansa Singh, Mr Abhishek Raj, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Mr. Satya Lipsu Ray, Mr. Satyalipsu Ray, Mr Baij Nath Patel, Ms Gurmeet Kaur Kwatra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. A.G. Garg, Ms. Shweta Garg, Mr. K.V. Mohan, Mr. K. V. Mohan, Mr. Rakesh Garg, Mr A.G.Garg, Mr Rakesh Garg, Mr. Sidharth Rathore, Mr. R.K. Raghavan, Mr. K.V. Balakrishnan, Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Mr. C.S. Agarwal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 24 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. Time of three weeks is granted to learned counsel for the appellants to take fresh steps to serve the unserved sole respondent.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Education Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Next hearing

13 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 21 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 29 other files in the folder were left out.