- 12 March 2021. 1 Mr K M Nataraj, learned Additional Solicitor General is requested to place a copy of the relevant notification, namely, Notification No 22/2003-CE dated 31 March 2003 (as amended and applicable at the relevant time) on the record together with any other relevant provisions of law or circulars that he seeks to rely up
- 26 March 2021. 1 Mr K M Nataraj, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that: (i) In terms of Notification No 22/2003-Central Excise dated 31 March 2003, the respondent was under an obligation to fulfill the conditions imposed on it as an EOU;
- 8 November 2021. 1 Issue notice. 2 Tag with Civil Appeal No 723 of 2021.
- 11 February 2022. Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that they have filed spare copies on 10.2.2022 and that notices may be issued. Office report indicates that the Hon'ble Court vide order dt.26.3.2021 had issued specific directions upon the appellant; however, the same have not yet been complied with. As such, matter be processed f
- 17 October 2022. The office report states that the learned counsel for the appellant has filed an affidavit of valuation on 14.2.2022 and the deficit court fee of Rs. 1,14,267/- was paid on 24.2.2022 but the same is defective as the court fee of Rs. 18,247/- deposited is not in the name of of litigant and pertains to year 2017. It is f
- 10 February 2023. Delay in filing spare copy is condoned.
- 7 April 2025. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the respondent, list the matters after four weeks.
- 14 July 2025. 1. Taking into consideration the averments made in the applications seeking amendment in cause title, the said applications are allowed. 2. List next week.
- 15 April 2026. 1. None present on behalf of the appellant when the matters were called out. 2. List in the next week.
- 27 April 2026. 1. The Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution, in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Ms. Vishaka, Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. M.K. Maroria, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Ms. Vishakha, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. N.Venkataraman, Ms. Meera Patel, Mr. Kamlendra Mishra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. M. P. Devanath, Mr. Prashant Shivadass, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Mr. Rishab, Mr. Hridyanand Okha, Mr. Hridyanand Ojha
