COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) KOLKATA Versus M/S ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL (C.A. 13160/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13160/2025

Case Record

C.A. 13160/2025

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) KOLKATA Versus M/S ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL

MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

10 PDF renditions· 10 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) KOLKATA Versus M/S ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL. C.A. 13160/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010479772025. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 13 October 2025 to 17 August 2026.

On 13 October 2025 the order records: 1. Delay condoned. 2. Application(s) for exemption are allowed.
On 17 December 2025 the order records: Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
On 23 January 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
On 17 February 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in the meantime.
On 18 March 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 4, 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 and 20.
On 12 May 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 and 20 but none has entered appearance.
On 16 July 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 & 20 but none has entered appearance.
On 17 August 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 & 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 & 20 but none has entered appearance.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

13 October 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Application(s) for exemption are allowed.
11 November 2025. As per office report, Mr. G.S. Makker, learned counsel for the appellant has only filed one spare copy with regard to respondent nos. 1 to 20. One week's time is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to file deficit spare copies.
17 December 2025. Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
23 January 2026. Respondent Nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any be filed in the meantime.
17 February 2026. Respondent nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in the meantime.
18 March 2026. Respondent nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 4, 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 and 20.
17 April 2026. Respondent nos. 1, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 4, 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 and 20.
12 May 2026. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 and 20 but none has entered appearance.
16 July 2026. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 and 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 & 20 but none has entered appearance.
17 August 2026. Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 & 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 & 20 but none has entered appearance.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. N.Venkataraman, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. V.C.bharathi, Mr. Sarthak Karol, Mr. Anmol Chandan, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Mr. Rajendra Singh Chauhan, Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr Vikrant Yadav, Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Soni, Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sudhir Malhotra, Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, Ms. Vedanshi Verma, Ms. Ekta Choudhary, Ms. Twinkle Singh, Mr. Kishore Kunal, Ms. Rushali Sikand, Mr. Ankur Anand, Ms. Twinkle Singh Chauhan, Ms. Ankita Prakash, Ms. Priya Rathi, Mr. Gaurav Grover

Relief Sought & Granted

On 17 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 13 & 14 are duly represented. Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 8 to 12, 15, 17, 19 & 20 but none has entered appearance.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 17 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 17 Aug 2026

Next hearing

11 Nov 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.