- 28 September 2012. Issue fresh notice with additional dasti service on unserved respondents. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to serve through the nearest Civil Court/Trial Court where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel where State authorit
- 19 August 2015. Service upon all the 26 respondents is complete. An application for amendment of the cause titl e in respect of respondent no.26 on account of change in name of the said respondent-company has been filed but cer tain defects are noticed. Be cured within two weeks t ime.
- 9 December 2015. This is an application seeking amendment of cause title in respect of respondent No. 26. As prayed by the counsel for the applicant, the name of respondent No. 26 is changed from M/s M.P.
- 8 August 2016. None appears for respondent nos. 6,7,8,10,12,13,15,21,22 and 24 despite due service. Remaining respondents are duly represented except for respondent nos. 23 and 25.
- 16 September 2016. As a last chance, four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to comply with Office Report dated 29.08.2016, failing which the Civil Appeal shall stand dismissed qua respondent Nos.23 and 25 without further reference to the Court. (SWETA DHYANI) (SUMAN JAIN) SR.P.A.
- 3 July 2018. As per postal tracking report in respect of respondent No.20 notice has been received back undelivered. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
- 16 August 2018. Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the appellant has filed the requisite court fee, but not filed the affidavit of valuation. Let the affidavit of valuation be filed within four weeks.
- 4 October 2018. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks', as a last chance file the affidavit of valuation. List again on 4.12.2018.
- 4 December 2018. Service is complete. Learned counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case within the prescribed period.
- 11 February 2026. Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 10, 11, 14 to 18 & 26 are duly represented. Respondent Nos. 23 & 25 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 16.09.2016.
- 12 March 2026. Respondent nos. 4, 5, 10, 11, 14 to 18 and 26 are duly represented. Respondent nos. 23 and 25 have been deleted vide the Hon'ble Court's order dated 16.09.2016.
- 10 April 2026. Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 10, 11, 14 to 18 & 26 are duly represented. Respondent No. 23 & 25 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 16.09.2016.
- 6 May 2026. Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 10, 11, 14 to 18 & 26 are duly represented. Respondent Nos. 23 & 25 have been deleted vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 16.09.2016.
- 29 May 2026. Respondent nos. 4, 5, 10, 11, 14 to 18 and 26 are duly represented. Respondent nos. 23 and 25 have been deleted vide the Hon'ble Court's order dated 16.09.2016.
- 3 August 2026. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 1, 2, 6 to 8, 12, 13, 19 to 22 and 24. Respondent nos. 3 to 5, 9 to 11, 14 to 18 and 26 are duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in the meantime.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr Kailash Pandey, Mrs Anil Katiyar, Ms Mamta Saxena, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr Neeraj Sharma, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Dr. Ashwani Bharadwaj, Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Ms. Vaidruti Mishra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Mr Udit Jain, Mr. Udit Jain, Mr. Kumar Visalaksh, Mr. Ashish Jain, Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Mrs. Anupama Sharma, Mr. Amar Jyoti Sharma, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Vats, Mr. Ganesh Kumar Malviya, Ms. Avani Rai
