- 8 August 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Appeals admitted.
- 4 September 2025. Sole respondent is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks' time to file affidavit of valuation.
- 27 October 2025. Sole respondent is granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of the unserved sole respondent. Dasti, in addition, is allowed as prayed for.
- 28 November 2025. Sole respondent has failed to file counter affidavit, despite the grant of last opportunity. Hence, further opportunity to file the same is hereby declined. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time, as last opportunity, to take fresh steps for service on the sole respondent.
- 15 January 2026. Opportunity of the sole respondent to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application seeking substituted service on respondent nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 15 in newspapers namely, 'Divya Bhaskar', Gujarati and 'Times of India', English language. Application is hereby al
- 12 February 2026. Opportunity of the sole respondent to file counter affidavit has already been declined vide order dt.15.01.2026. Affidavit of valuation and court fee have been filed.
- 18 March 2026. Opportunity of the sole respondent to file counter affidavit has already been declined vide order dated Affidavit of valuation and court fee have already been filed. Service was complete on respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 & 15 through publication on 04.02.2026 but none has entered appearance.
- 22 April 2026. C.A No. 10459/2025 Sole respondent has filed counter affidavit but after opportunity to file the same was declined. Registry to make a specific mention of this fact in office report while placing the matter before the Hon'ble Court. C.A Nos. 10460-10475/2025 Affidavit of valuation and court fee have been filed.
- 25 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and granted three weeks time to move appropriate application to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 9. 2. It is made clear that in the event of default appropriate orders shall follow.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. N.venkataraman, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Mr. Kamal Kishore, Mr. Baij Nath Patel, Mr. Gobind Kumar, Ms. Reena Pandey, Ms Reena Pandey, Mr Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Mr Pankaj Singh Advocates — Respondents: Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Ms. Nandita Chauhan, Ms. Tijil Thakur, Mr. Vishal Shrivastav, Mr. Abhay Agnihotri
