- 25 March 2022. Leave granted. In the meantime, there shall be stay of operation and implementation of the impugned Judgment.
- 20 October 2022. As per certificate of service received from the High Court in respect of sole respondent with remarks, “non-functioning of the office mentioned in the address”. Three weeks time, is granted to learned counsel for appellant, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve sole respondent, as process could not b
- 2 December 2022. Two weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve sole respondent, as process could not be served. List again on 20.01.2023.
- 20 January 2023. Ld. Counsel for appellant has filed application for substituted service in respect of sole respondent but the same is defective. Two weeks time is given to cure the same. List again on 27.2.2023.
- 27 February 2023. Ld. counsel for the Appellant has filed application for substituted service through paper publication in respect of sole respondent. However, Ms. Asmita Singh, Ld. Advocate, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of sole respondent, which is defective.
- 20 April 2023. Ms. Asmita Singh, Ld. Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent. Hence, the application filed by petitioner for substituted service through paper publication in respect of the respondent be treated as withdrawn.
- 20 September 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 18 October 2024. IA No. 165627/2024 seeking early hearing is allowed. List the appeal on 13.11.2024.
- 6 February 2025. This matter was mentioned by learned counsel for the respondent. List the appeal on 06.03.2025.
- 8 September 2025. List in third week of January, 2026. (NEHA GUPTA) (AVGV RAMU) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 22 January 2026. The appeal stand dismissed in terms of the signed order placed on the file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Madavi Divan, Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Ms. Preeti Rani, Ms. Vaishali Verma, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. TACHO ERU, Mrs. A. Deepa, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Mr. Antriksh Singh, Mr. Bharat Lal Shivhare, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Harshit Goel, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Tushar Nair, Mr. Anirudh Anand, Mr. Punishk Handa, Ms. Ankita Makan
