- 2 January 2017. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 13 February 2017. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 18 July 2017. List before the Court. (OM PARKASH SHARMA) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR CUM PS
- 10 August 2018. There are 29 appellants in Civil Appeal Nos.9928 9929 of 2016 who are also arrayed as respondents in Civil Appeal No.2830 of 2016. These are two cross appeals. It is ordered that appellants in Civil Appeal Nos.9928-9929 of 2016 are deemed to have been served in the other cross appeal. We also understand that some of th
- 23 January 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for service of unserved respondents mentioned in Office Report dated 22.1.2019 and take appropriate steps in case where respondent is dead within four weeks. List again on 12.3.2019.
- 12 March 2019. 2830 of 2017 As per Office Report dated 11.03.2019, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 submits that s he will file an application for publication in the local newspaper. As a last opportunity, ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of unserved responden
- 7 May 2019. Application for deletion filed in respect of respondent no.44(dead) in C.A. No.9928/2016 is defective. Defects be cured within four weeks time. Item no.18 Application for substituted service filed in respect of all unserved respondents in C.A. No. 9928-29/2016 is defective. Defects be cured within four weeks time.
- 13 August 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent No.52. As prayed, application (I.A.No.103911/2019) for substituted service in respect of unserved respondents is allowed. Needful be done within four weeks from today.
- 25 February 2020. IA No. 60278 of 2019 in C.A. Nos. 9928-9929 of 2016 The Petitioner's prayer is for deletion of Respondent No. 44 from the array of parties. In paragraph 4 of the petition it has been stated that Respondent No. 44 has passed away and the matter being a service related dispute, there is no need for substitution of his LR
- 4 March 2021. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, further four weeks' time is granted to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent No. 52. (NIDHI AHUJA) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) AR-cum-PS
- 8 September 2021. Delay in filing the application for substitution stands condoned considering the reasons stated in the application. Application for setting aside abatement is allowed. Let notice be issued to the proposed Legal Representatives of deceased Respondent No.52.
- 16 October 2023. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted eight weeks time to do the needful as pointed out by the Registry, as is evident from the Office Report. Let the needful be done.
- 17 January 2024. This matter was mentioned today. We are not inclined to pass any order.
- 5 February 2024. Await service of notice on respondent no. 52. Since sufficient time has been granted to take steps in respect of Respondent nos. 128, 129 and 130 and more than two years having lapsed, steps not having been taken, Civil Appeal Nos. 9928-9929/2016 in respect of respondent nos. 128, 129 and 130 stand dismissed for non pr
- 19 April 2024. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that all the respondents to the appeals are duly served. Registry to place the matters before the Court.
- 14 May 2024. Service of notice of alternative arrangement(counsel expired) is complete on respondent nos. 23, 26, 35, 103 and 119 but none has entered appearance. Re-issue notice for alternative arrangement(counsel expired) in respect of respondent nos.115 to 117.
- 14 August 2024. Service of notice for alternative arrangement (earlier counsel expired) is complete on respondent Nos.23, 26, 35, 103 and 119 but none has entered appearance. Service of notice for alternative arrangement (earlier counsel expired) is not complete on respondent Nos. 115 to 117. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted t
- 3 October 2024. Ld. counsel for the appellants has filed application for deletion in respect of respondent nos.15, 28, 37, 43, 48, 56, 59, 61, 62, 68, 69, 80, 83, 90, 101, 111, 115, 116 & 117 in Hence, process the said application for listing before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers, for kind consideration.
- 2 January 2025. Issue notice returnable within four weeks. Let the copy of Interlocutory Application be served to other side.
- 19 May 2025. 1. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), the time of four weeks is granted to do the needful. 2. List thereafter.
- 6 October 2025. Respondent Nos. 15, 28, 37, 43, 48, 56, 59, 61, 62, 68, 69, 80, 83, 90, 101, 111, 115, 116 and 117 in C.A. No. 9928/2016 and Respondent Nos. 13 and 37 in C.A. No. 9929/2016 is allowed, at the risk of the Appellants. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the Appellants to serve the unserved respondents.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Ms. A. Shukla, Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Ms. Amey Vikrama Thanvi, Ms. Ajita Tandon, Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, Mr. Amiy Shukla, Mr. Sudhaker T., Mr. Shakti Vardhan, Mr. Chiryl, Mr. Amar Dave, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal Advocates — Respondents: Dr. Harsh Pathak, Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Mr. Mohit Choubey, Ms. Shaveta Mahajan, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Amiy Shukla, Mr. Sudhaker T., Mr. Shakti Vardhan, Mr. Chiryl, Mr. P.Kumaran, Mr. Satya Mitra Garg
