CHAITANYA Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. (C.A. 11196/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 11196/2025

Case Record

C.A. 11196/2025

CHAITANYA Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

9 PDF renditions· 9 distinct judicial orders· 9 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

CHAITANYA Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.. C.A. 11196/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010440592023. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 9 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 20 November 2023 to 25 August 2025.

On 20 November 2023 the order records: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions from the petitioner's father and uncle about the validity certificates issued to them. List on 28th November, 2023.
On 28 November 2023 the order records: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Reliance was placed by the petitioner on the Caste Validity Certificates granted to her father(Sanjay Vithalrao Palekar) and her uncle (Rajiv Vithalrao Palekar). In both the cases, Caste Validity Certificate was refused in the earlier proceedings.
On 29 January 2024 the order records: The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 seeks time to take instructions. List on 4th March, 2024.
On 4 March 2024 the order records: The learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6 seeks and is granted time of four weeks to file the affidavit. List on 19th April, 2024.
On 19 April 2024 the order records: List for hearing on 22nd October, 2024. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.6 states that hereafter the respondent no.6 will not act upon the caste validating certificate issued to him. We take the said statement on record.
On 25 August 2025 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. The appeal is partly allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

20 November 2023. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions from the petitioner's father and uncle about the validity certificates issued to them. List on 28th November, 2023.
28 November 2023. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Reliance was placed by the petitioner on the Caste Validity Certificates granted to her father(Sanjay Vithalrao Palekar) and her uncle (Rajiv Vithalrao Palekar). In both the cases, Caste Validity Certificate was refused in the earlier proceedings.
29 January 2024. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 seeks time to take instructions. List on 4th March, 2024.
4 March 2024. The learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6 seeks and is granted time of four weeks to file the affidavit. List on 19th April, 2024.
19 April 2024. List for hearing on 22nd October, 2024. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.6 states that hereafter the respondent no.6 will not act upon the caste validating certificate issued to him. We take the said statement on record.
22 October 2024. List on 8th April, 2025. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS
22 April 2025. List the matter on 29.04.2025 on top of the board.
29 April 2025. List on 06.5.2025, as a last chance.
25 August 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appeal is partly allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Mr. R.K.Mendadkar, Ms. Priyanka Shaw, Ms. Rucha, Mr. M.Veeraragavan, Ms. Gautami Yadav, Mr. Pranjal Chapalgaonkar, Mr. R. K. Mendadkar, Ms. Rucha A. Pande, Mr. M. Veeraragavan, Ms. Pranjal Chapalgaonkar, Mr. Sudhanshu Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Mr. C. George Thomas, Mr. Amol B. Karande, Mr. Shivang Singh, Mr. Aditya Yadav, Ms. Palak Mathur, Ms. Shireesh Tyagi, Ms. Pranali, Mr. Mahesh Prakash Shinde, Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta II, Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari

Relief Sought & Granted

On 25 August 2025 the order records: The appeal is partly allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 25 Aug 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 25 Aug 2025

Final disposition

The appeal is partly allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 9 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.