- 16 December 2010. G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Leave granted.
- 9 February 2011. As requested by Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation and agreed to by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter, which is listed for further consideration on 10.2.2011, will be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
- 10 February 2011. At the commencement of hearing, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate produced three sealed envelopes (two sets), which were opened in the Court in the presence of the learned counsel for the parties. The envelopes contain the following reports: 1. Progress re
- 1 March 2011. At the commencement of further hearing, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate produced a sealed envelope (two sets) and stated that the same contains the Progress Report dated 01.03.2011.
- 15 March 2011. At the commencement of further hearing, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the C.B.I. and the Enforcement Directorate placed before the Court the print dated 7.3.2011 taken out from the website of Tehelka Magazine. He also placed before the Court a copy of Inquiry Report dated 8.3.2011 prepared b
- 15 March 2011. At the commencement of further hearing, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the C.B.I. and the Enforcement Directorate placed before the Court the print dated 7.3.2011 taken out from the website of Tehelka Magazine. He also placed before the Court a copy of Inquiry Report dated 8.3.2011 prepared b
- 16 March 2011. At the commencement of hearing, learned Attorney General placed before the Court letter dated 14.03.2011 sent to him by the Registrar General of the High Court of Delhi conveying the decision taken by the High Court to nominate Shri O.P.Saini, an officer of Delhi Higher Judicial Service, who is presently posted as Spec
- 29 March 2011. Copies of the application be served upon the Union of India and other official respondents. Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.
- 30 March 2011. The learned Additional Solicitor General has handed over copies of the Gazette of India dated 28.3.2011 and Delhi Gazette dated 28.3.2011, in which the Notifications issued by the respective governments have been published. The same be kept on the file.
- 1 April 2011. counsel appearing for the C.B.I placed before the Court papers, perusal of which show notification under Section 6 of Delhi Police Establishment Act has been issued by the State Government for entrusting the case relating to death of Sadiq Batcha to the C.B.I. Shri Venugopal then stated that the CBI has no objection to
- 1 April 2011. counsel appearing for the C.B.I placed before the Court papers, perusal of which show notification under Section 6 of Delhi Police Establishment Act has been issued by the State Government for entrusting the case relating to death of Sadiq Batcha to the C.B.I. Shri Venugopal then stated that the CBI has no objection to
- 4 April 2011. In furtherance of the Court's order dated 1.4.2011, Ms. Indira Jaisingh, learned Additional Solicitor General has today placed before the Court xerox copy of letter dated 4.4.2011 sent to her by Additional Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India. Paragraphs Nos.2 and 3 of that letter are as
- 8 April 2011. Ms. Indira Jaisingh, learned Additional Solicitor General has placed her statement before the Court, which is taken on record. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement Directorate and Shri H.P. Raval, Additional Solicitor General have made further sub
- 11 April 2011. In terms of signed order, various directions are being given by this Court in exercise of its power under Article 136 read with Article 142 of the Constitution and in the interest of holding a fair prosecution of the case. List the case on 26.04.2011.
- 26 April 2011. Let this matter be listed on 27.04.2011 at 3.30 P.M. before the Bench which had passed the main order.
- 27 April 2011. Shri K.K.Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate handed over two sealed envelopes, which were opened in the Court. The envelopes contain the Investigation Report of the Directorate of Enforcement for the period from 29.03.2011 to 25.04.2011. Shri Venugopal took us to some
- 3 May 2011. A request for adjournment has been made on behalf of Shri K.K.Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate on the ground that Shri Venugopal had to go out of station. The request is accepted.
- 5 May 2011. Shri Vivek Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Income Tax Departmen t placed before the Court two sealed envelopes and stated that the same contain the reports pr epared by Additional Director (Investigation), Unit No.1, New Delhi. The sealed covers were o pened in the Court. We have cursoril
- 6 May 2011. In the main case i.e. Civil Appeal No.10660 of 2010 titled "Center for Public Interest Litigation and others v. Union of India and others", this Court had, on 16.3.2011, issued the following direction: "While adjourning the case, we make it clear that no one including the newspapers shall interfere with the functioning
- 11 May 2011. List on 13.5.2011.
- 13 May 2011. Today the case has been listed for further consideration of the issue relating to appointment of an independent body of person to assist the Court in monitoring the investigation being carried out by the C.B.I., the Enforcement Directorate and the Income Tax Department. Since the time left with the Court is not suffici
- 16 May 2011. Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned ASG appearing for the Income-tax Department produced two sealed envelopes which were opened in the court. We have briefly perused the latest report of the Income-tax department. Copy thereof shall be supplied to the learned ASG representing the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforceme
- 6 July 2011. At the commencement of further hearing, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement Directorate placed before the Court Progress Report dated 6.7.2011 prepared by the Central Bureau of Investigation. The sealed covers handed over by the counsel assisting
- 24 August 2011. Shri A.S. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General requests for an adjournment on the ground that he has to go to attend the Full Court Reference. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, Shri Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the non-petition
- 24 August 2011. Shri A.S. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General requests for an adjournment on the ground that he has to go to attend the Full Court Reference. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, Shri Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the non-petition
- 1 September 2011. Learned counsel assisting Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, handed over sealed envelopes containing the Progress Report submitted by the C.B.I. in Case No.RC DA1 2009 A 0045 and Preliminary Enquiry No.PE DA1 2011 A 0001 as also the Status Report of the invest
- 8 September 2011. After Dr.Subramanian Swamy made his submissions in the context of I.A.Nos.18 and 24 of 2011, Shri P.P.Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for Union of India pointed out that some of the documents like reply received by the applicant from the Director, Central Bureau of Investigation and further correspondence on the
- 20 September 2011. Dr. Subramanian Swamy made further submissions in the context of I.A. Nos.18 and 24 of 2011. Thereafter, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel commenced his submissions, which remained inconclusive. For further hearing, the case is adjourned to 21.9.2011. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
- 20 September 2011. Dr. Subramanian Swamy made further submissions in the context of I.A. Nos.18 and 24 of 2011. Thereafter, Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel commenced his submissions, which remained inconclusive. For further hearing, the case is adjourned to 21.9.2011. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
- 20 September 2011. List on 19.10.2011. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
- The record also contains 102 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Mr. H.P. Raval, Ms. Indira Jaising, Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Mr. Harish N. Parekh, Ms. Sonam Anand, Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. H.P. Raval, Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Mr. T.A. Khan, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Ms. Shweta Verma, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Dr. Aaray Lingaiah, Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr. Navin Chawla, Mr. Ramji Srinivasan
