CANARA BANK OVERSEAS BRANCH Versus ARCHEAN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANR. [ HEARD BY : HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. R. MAHADEVAN, JJ. ] (C.A. 13861/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13861/2024

Case Record

C.A. 13861/2024

CANARA BANK OVERSEAS BRANCH Versus ARCHEAN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANR. [ HEARD BY : HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. R. MAHADEVAN, JJ. ]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

14 PDF renditions· 14 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

CANARA BANK OVERSEAS BRANCH Versus ARCHEAN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.. C.A. 13861/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010164342022. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 10 October 2022 to 17 March 2026.

On 20 October 2022 the order records: Issue notice to the respondents. In the meantime, there shall be interim stay of the judgment passed by the High Court.
On 22 March 2023 the order records: Despite due service on respondent No.2, there is no appearance. However, Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. K.B. Thakur, Ld. Advocate-on-Record, for Respondent No.2.
On 9 May 2023 the order records: Despite service of notice on respondent No. 2, there is no appearance. However Mr. Narender Lodiwal, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Krishna Ballabh Thakur, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.2. He seeks and is granted two weeks time to file vakalatnama and four weeks time to file counter affidavit.
On 28 July 2023 the order records: Despite due service on respondent no.2, there is no appearance. However, Mr. Narender Lodiwal, Ld. Advocate appearing for Mr. Krishan Ballabh Thakur, Ld. AOR seeks for time to file vakalatnama and submits that counter affidavit would not be filed on his behalf. Four weeks time, is granted for filing vakalatnama. Four w
On 28 November 2024 the order records: 1. Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the parties 2. Leave granted in both the matters.
On 29 January 2026 the order records: 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

10 October 2022. Delay in refiling is condoned. Registry to process as per rules.
20 October 2022. Issue notice to the respondents. In the meantime, there shall be interim stay of the judgment passed by the High Court.
22 March 2023. Despite due service on respondent No.2, there is no appearance. However, Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. K.B. Thakur, Ld. Advocate-on-Record, for Respondent No.2.
9 May 2023. Despite service of notice on respondent No. 2, there is no appearance. However Mr. Narender Lodiwal, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Krishna Ballabh Thakur, Ld. Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.2. He seeks and is granted two weeks time to file vakalatnama and four weeks time to file counter affidavit.
28 July 2023. Despite due service on respondent no.2, there is no appearance. However, Mr. Narender Lodiwal, Ld. Advocate appearing for Mr. Krishan Ballabh Thakur, Ld. AOR seeks for time to file vakalatnama and submits that counter affidavit would not be filed on his behalf. Four weeks time, is granted for filing vakalatnama. Four w
28 November 2024. 1. Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the parties 2. Leave granted in both the matters.
6 November 2025. As prayed for, list the appeals on 12-11-2025.
19 November 2025. List next week.
3 December 2025. List on 10-12-2025 on top of the Board.
11 December 2025. List on 22-1-2026 on top of the Board.
29 January 2026. 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.
17 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
17 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anand Gautam, Mr. Nipun Sharma, Mr. Sachin Singh, Mr. Vidur Ahluwalia, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Mr. Anant Gautam, Mr. Sumit Sharma, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Ritesh Chopra, Mr. Kartik Jindal, Ms. Anani Achumi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Mr. K.B. Thakur, Mr. Krishna Ballabh Thakur, Mr. Narender Lodiwal, Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Mr. Krishan Ballabh Thakur, Mr. Ramakrishnan Viraraghavan, Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Mr. Dinesh Sharma

Relief Sought & Granted

On 29 January 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Taxation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 17 Mar 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 17 Mar 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.