C.M. MEENAKSHI Versus ARCHBISHOP OF BANGALORE AND ORS. ORDER (C.A. 5015/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 5015/2025

Case Record

C.A. 5015/2025

C.M. MEENAKSHI Versus ARCHBISHOP OF BANGALORE AND ORS. ORDER

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

C.A.Expedite trial Civil appeals

14 PDF renditions· 14 distinct judicial orders· 14 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

C.M. MEENAKSHI Versus ARCHBISHOP OF BANGALORE & ORS.. C.A. 5015/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010383502024. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 14 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 13 September 2024 to 20 November 2025.

On 13 September 2024 the order records: Issue notice, returnable in four weeks. (DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR
On 6 November 2024 the order records: Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 10 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to respondent Nos. 2 to 9, 11 & 12.
On 17 December 2024 the order records: Four weeks time, is granted to the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 11 to file counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent Nos. 10 and 12, there is no appearance.
On 5 March 2025 the order records: 1. As per Office Report, service upon respondent nos.10 and 12 is incomplete. 2. The present petition is proceeded ex-parte qua respondent nos.10 and 12.
On 1 April 2025 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
On 15 April 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Issue notice on IA No. 89415/2025.
On 10 June 2025 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to file a fresh application seeking appropriate interim relief in this Civil Appeal. He is permitted to do so. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (AKSHAY KUMAR BHORIA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
On 20 November 2025 the order records: The appeal is dismissed in terms of the non reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

13 September 2024. Issue notice, returnable in four weeks. (DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR
6 November 2024. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 10 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to respondent Nos. 2 to 9, 11 & 12.
17 December 2024. Four weeks time, is granted to the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 11 to file counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent Nos. 10 and 12, there is no appearance.
5 March 2025. 1. As per Office Report, service upon respondent nos.10 and 12 is incomplete. 2. The present petition is proceeded ex-parte qua respondent nos.10 and 12.
1 April 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
9 April 2025. List I.A. No. 89415/2025 on 15.04.2025.
15 April 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Issue notice on IA No. 89415/2025.
24 April 2025. Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the wall has been since demolished. His submission is placed on record.
27 May 2025. List on 10.06.2025.
10 June 2025. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to file a fresh application seeking appropriate interim relief in this Civil Appeal. He is permitted to do so. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (AKSHAY KUMAR BHORIA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
18 August 2025. List on 02.09.2025.
2 September 2025. List on 22.09.2025.
22 September 2025. be considered at the time of hearing of the civil appeal. Hearing expedited.
20 November 2025. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the non reportable judgment. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Dr. Aditya Sondhi, Mr. Abhishek Manchanda, Mr. Keshav, Mr. Anubhav Kumar, Ms. Aishwarya, Mr. Tanmay Sinha, Mr. H. Subramanya Jois, Mr. Keshav Datar, Mr. Keshav M. Datar, Mr. Abhishek Kamal, Mr. Anand Grover, Mr. Dinesh Yadav Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sanbha Rumnong, Ms. Lija Merin John, Mr. Karamveer Singh Yadav, Ms. Purnima Krishna, Mrs. T.S. Shanthi, Ms. Sneha Irine Kachhap, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. P. Srinivasan, Mr. Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Mr. S.k Pandey, Mr. Awanish Kumar, Mr. Anshul Rai

Relief Sought & Granted

On 20 November 2025 the order records: The appeal is dismissed in terms of the non reportable judgment.

Subjects

Expedite trial Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 20 Nov 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 20 Nov 2025

Final disposition

The appeal is dismissed in terms of the non reportable judgment.

Important procedural note

Written only from 14 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.