- 12 December 2011. As prayed for, four weeks' time is granted to file affidavit of service on legal representatives of deceased respondent No.3, failing which the Appeal against the concerned respondent shall stand dismissed. .......................J.
- 24 February 2012. As prayed for, four weeks' time is granted to the appellants to file statement of case, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed. Respondents are also given four weeks' time to file statement of case from the date of service of statement of case filed on behalf of the appellants.
- 23 March 2012. Delay in filing the substitution application as also the substitution application are allowed. As the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 3 are already represented, there is no necessity of issuing notice to them.
- 17 July 2012. Office report indicates that notice addressed to respondent 1(a) has been returned with endorsement "No such person". The counsel representing Mrs. Priya Puri, advocate submits that respondent No.1(a) is Ravi Datt @ Pawan Kumar. Mrs. Priya Puri, advocate has filed Vakalatnama for respondent No.1(a)also. Office to verif
- 5 September 2012. Notice is still awaited from respondent No. 1(a). Ld. counsel who submitted on 17.7.2012 that she has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Lrs. of deceased respondent No.1(a) on 17.7.2012 submits that she has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1(a) who is shown in the party array as "Pawan Kumar" who according to t
- 16 October 2012. Ld. counsel for the respondents in the I.A. for substitution granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit, if any. List the matter on 11.12.2012.
- 16 October 2012. Ld. counsel for the respondents in the I.A. for substitution granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit, if any. List the matter on 11.12.2012.
- 11 December 2012. Service is complete. Respondent has not filed the statement of case in spite of time granted by the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further orders with an appropriate office report indicating the above.
- 5 February 2013. Four weeks' time is granted to the respondents to file statement of case. |(VINOD LAKHINA) | |(PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) | |
- 10 September 2013. From the office report dated 3.7.2013 it appears that respondent nos. 4,5 and 6 have not filed statement of case so far. There is no appearance on behalf of the said respondents though the office report says that service of notice is complete. In the circumstances, the right of respondent nos.
- 7 February 2014. Service is complete. Original record has been received.
- 27 July 2017. List the matter before a Bench of which one of us (Justice Deepak Gupta) is not a member.
- 6 December 2017. The matter is referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to amicably settle the dispute between the parties. Accordingly, we direct both the parties to appear before the Ld.Co-ordinator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre at 110, Lawyers' Chambers (R.K. Jain Block), Supreme Court Compound, Tilak Marg, New Delhi on 08.0
- 2 May 2018. By order dated 06.12.2017, this Court referred the matter to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to amicably settle the dispute between the parties. We have perused interim mediation report dated 27.03.2018, received from the learned Mediator along with the Office Report for direction dated 04.04.2018.
- 13 August 2018. Perused office report dated 01.08.2018. The time for mediation is extended by six weeks from today.
- 8 October 2018. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, list the matter after four weeks. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
- 12 November 2018. The parties can approach the learned Mediator again for sorting out certain clarification/adjustments and further agreement. Accordingly, we direct the parties to appear before the learned Mediator on 15.11.2018.
- 11 March 2019. Application for discharge of advocate on record has been filed. It is informed that the subsequent lawyer engaged by the respondent has already filed V/A. In view of the above statement, application for discharge of advocate on record is allowed.
- 12 April 2019. IA 31582/2019 & 31583/2019 Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing application for substitution and application for substitution.
- 20 February 2020. None appears on behalf of respondent(s). List the matter next week.
- 28 February 2020. None present for respondents today either. Having regard to the submission made, delay in filing application for substitution is condoned and the application for substitution is allowed.
- 23 November 2022. 1. Since, this Court, at the first instance, has referred the parties to mediation through the Order dated 06.12.2017, the learned Mediator has submitted a report dated 06.12.2018 indicating the nature of certain agreements entered into between the parties. 2. When the appeal is taken up for consideration today, the le
- 9 February 2023. Issue fresh notice to the legal representatives of Respondent No. 3, returnable in six weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
- 22 May 2025. Issue fresh notice to respondent No.3, in view of the submission made by the learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellants that between the other respondents and the appellants, mediation has progressed sufficiently towards settlement.
- 15 January 2026. Despite service of notice, there is no appearance on behalf of respondent No.3. We have been informed that the matter has been settled amongst the other parties. A suggestion is made to Mr. Aman Khan Aghani, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5 to make an endeavour to get in touch with respondent No.3 t
- 22 July 2026. List the matter after eight weeks. In the meantime, respondent No.3 shall participate in the mediation proceedings.
- 23 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Mr. Gopal Jha, Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Brijendra Chahar, Mr. Gautam Singh, Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Mr. Vivek Vardhan, Ms. Isha Singh, Ms. Snehil Sonam, Mr. S. Prasad, Ms. Disha Singh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. H.K. Puri, Ms. Priya PUri, Mr. S.K.Puri, Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Vinay Arora, Ms. Priya Puri, Mr. Shravan Sahny, Mrs. Priya Puri, Mr. Sagar Singhal, Mr. Suryanaryana Singh, Ms. Pragati Neekhra
