- 16 April 2014. Perused the communications received from Mr. Sunil Gavaskar, the interim president for the BCCI for IPL-2014. He has stated that as he is not privy to all the information that the investigating authorities have with regard to Mr. Sundar Raman, it is inappropriate for him to take a decision as to whether Mr. Sundar Rama
- 22 April 2014. IA NO.6 of 2014 had been filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India [for short 'the BCCI'] to permit the BCCI to receive copies of the relevant portion of the audio recordings relating to CA No. 4235/2014 interaction with Mr. M.S. Dhoni on 6th January, 2014; interaction with Mr. N. Srinivasan on 19th December,
- 29 April 2014. Heard learned counsel for the parties. We are of the considered opinion that until duly constituted Probe Committee investigates into the allegations made against the cricketers and Mr.
- 16 May 2014. A. K. PATNAIK, J. The Cricket Association of Bihar filed PIL No.55 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitution of a panel of two retired judges of the Madras High Court by the BCCI to probe into the allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPL, 2013 against Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan as the alleged Team
- 16 May 2014. A. K. PATNAIK, J. The Cricket Association of Bihar filed PIL No.55 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitution of a panel of two retired judges of the Madras High Court by the BCCI to probe into the allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPL, 2013 against Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan as the alleged Team
- 16 May 2014. A. K. PATNAIK, J. The Cricket Association of Bihar filed PIL No.55 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitution of a panel of two retired judges of the Madras High Court by the BCCI to probe into the allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPL, 2013 against Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan as the alleged Team
- 16 May 2014. A. K. PATNAIK, J. The Cricket Association of Bihar filed PIL No.55 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitution of a panel of two retired judges of the Madras High Court by the BCCI to probe into the allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPL, 2013 against Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan as the alleged Team
- 16 May 2014. A. K. PATNAIK, J. The Cricket Association of Bihar filed PIL No.55 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitution of a panel of two retired judges of the Madras High Court by the BCCI to probe into the allegations of betting and spot fixing in IPL, 2013 against Mr. Gurunath Meiyappan as the alleged Team
- 11 July 2014. Not before the Bench of which Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman is the member.
- 18 July 2014. By an order dated 28th March, 2014 this Court had made an interim arrangement under which Mr. Sunil Gavaskar was authorised Signature Not Verified to function as and exercise the powers of the President of the Digitally signed by Mahabir Singh Date: 2014.07.22 09:46:35 IST BCCI in relation to IPL season seven, 2014 til
- 1 September 2014. The Probe Committee headed by Justice Mukul Mudgal, Former Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, has submitted an interim report setting out the nature and the extent of the investigation so far conducted by it. From a reading of the report, it is evident that the investigation remains incomplete as at
- 10 November 2014. Mr. C.A.Sundram, learned senior counsel for the BCCI points out that the petitioner has filed an independent writ petition before the High Court at Bombay in which issues that arise for consideration in these proceedings are also sought to be agitated. He urged that the proceedings before the Bombay High Court could be
- 14 November 2014. Justice Mukul Mudgal Committee has submitted its report in a sealed cover. We have had an occasion to go through the report. Certain findings recorded by the Mudgal Committee apparently indict some of the individuals in regard to whom the Committee was asked to conduct a probe. Learned counsel for the parties agree tha
- 24 November 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments tomorrow i.e. on 25.11.2014 at 2.00 P.M..
- 27 November 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments on Monday, the 1 st December, 2014 at 2 P.M.
- 27 November 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments on Monday, the 1 st December, 2014 at 2 P.M.
- 9 December 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments tomorrow i.e. on 10.12.2014 at 10.30 A.M.
- 9 December 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments tomorrow i.e. on 10.12.2014 at 10.30 A.M.
- 9 December 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments tomorrow i.e. on 10.12.2014 at 10.30 A.M.
- 10 December 2014. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments on Monday, the 15th December, 2014 at 2 P.M.
- 15 December 2014. Heard in-part. Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, learned senior counsel appearing for Cricket Association of Bihar, points out that SLP(C) No.34228 of 2014, arising out of an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the amended Rule 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regulation for Players, Umpires and Administrators,
- 17 December 2014. Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
- 17 December 2014. Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
- 15 April 2015. Post I.A. No..... of 2015 (For Direction) on Friday, the 17th April, 2015 at 2 p.m. before a Bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. Thakur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla.
- 7 August 2015. and disposed of in terms of signed order. terms of the signed order.
- 4 February 2016. Justice R.M. Lodha Committee appointed by this Court in terms of our order dated 22.01.2015 has submitted its report on reforms in cricket in India. Ms. Indu Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the Cricket Association of Bihar has taken us through parts of the said report and submitted that the report is not only a
- 3 March 2016. Post on Friday, the 18 th March, 2016 at 2.00 P.M. All intervention applications are allowed. Intervenors are permitted to file their affidavits, if so advised, in the meantime.
- 16 March 2016. Post on Friday i.e. 18.03.2016 along with Civil Appeal No. 4235 of 2014 etc. before a special Bench comprising Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fakkir Mohammed Ibrahim Kalifulla at 2.00 p.m.. (Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS
- 5 April 2016. Heard in-part. All intervention applications filed till date are allowed.
- 8 April 2016. Heard in-part. Post for continuation of arguments on Monday i.e. the 11 th April, 2016 at 2 P.M.
- The record also contains 176 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. C. A. Sundaram, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mrs. Akhila Kaushik, Mr. P. R. Raman, Ms. S. P. Arthi, Ms. Rohini Musa, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Mr. Rahul Mascarenhas, Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, Mr. Ajit P. Sinha, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Mr. Chandrashekhar Advocates — Respondents: Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, Mr. Ajit P. Sinha, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Mr. Chandrashekhar, Mr. Gagan Gupta, Mr. C. A. Sundaram, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mrs. Akhila Kaushik, Mr. P. R. Raman, Ms. S. P. Arthi, Ms. Rohini Musa, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi
