- 6 December 2021. Issue notice, returnable within five weeks. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
- 16 November 2022. Service is not complete upon sole respondent. However, Mr. Kartik Dabas, Ld. Counsel for petitioner requests for fresh dasti.
- 4 January 2023. Service is not complete upon sole respondent. As prayed, dasti notice be issued at the address, upon taking fresh steps in this regard within two weeks. List again on 09.02.2023.
- 9 February 2023. Despite due service on the sole respondent, there is no appearance. Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 27 March 2023. Leave granted. Despite service, none has appeared for the respondent. The respondent is proceeded ex parte.
- 27 June 2024. Adjourned.
- 3 July 2025. 1) None appears. 2) List after four weeks.
- 28 November 2025. 1. IA No.272712/25 seeking early hearing of the appeal is allowed. 2. List the appeal in the month of January, 2026.
- 19 February 2026. 1. Despite service of notice, respondent has chosen not to enter appearance. He was proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 2. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the view that the parties must endeavour to resolve their disputes amicably. 3. As such, we request and appoint Mr.
- 18 March 2026. 1. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that he has endeavoured to comply with the order passed by this Court. However, in the absence of the latest particulars, the respondent could not be informed about the pendency of the present petition. 2. Learned Amicus Curiae further submits that he is in touch with the office of the
- 7 May 2026. 1. Learned amicus curiae submits that he is in touch with the respondent and prays for an adjournment. 2. List on 22.07.2026.
- 23 July 2026. With the consent of the parties, we refer the present matter before the 'Supreme Court Action for Mediated Adjudication and Disputes Harmonization Across Nation' Samadhan Samaroh.
- 22 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prabodh Kumar, Ms. Chetna Verma M., Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha, Mr. Kartik Dabas, Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Mr. Prashant Kumar Tyagi, Mr. P.Srinivas Reddy, Mr. P.srinivas Reddy, Mr. P. Srinivas Reddy Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Meenesh Dubey
