- 27 August 2024. 1. We are informed by Mr. Pavan Kumar that the High Court of Karnataka has taken a different view of the matter and the special leave petition against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka filed by the individual employee has already been dismissed by this Court in SLP (C) 9197 of 2013. In this view of the matter
- 8 April 2025. Service is complete on respondent no.1. Ld. Counsel, Ms Anju Rani appearing on behalf of Mr Dhananjay Bhaskar Ray, Advocate-on-record appears on behalf of respondent no.1 and submits that vakalatnama has been filed yesterday and seeks time to file counter affidavit. Registry to verify and update the records. Counter af
- 22 May 2025. Respondent no.1 is granted four weeks' time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on the remaining respondents but none has entered appearance.
- 18 August 2025. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment for filing rejoinder affidavit, the matter stands adjourned. List on 01.09.2025.
- 1 September 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
- 25 November 2025. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented and filed reply. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Pavan Kumar, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. Parashu Ram Mandal, Ms. Neelam, Mr. Mukesh Chandra, Mr. Kumar Arnav Singh Deo, Mrs. Neelam, Mr. Akhlesh Kr. Soni Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Anju Rani, Mr. Dhananjay Bhaskar Ray, Mr. Arunav Patnaik, Mr. Nirbhay Nitya Nanda
