- 13 May 2010. Delay condoned. The appeal is dismissed in terms of signed order.
- 6 August 2013. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that his statement of case is ready. He is permitted to file the same within a week from today. Respondent no.4 seeks two weeks' time to file the statement of case.
- 10 March 2014. Appellants have filed statement of case. Counsel for the respondents has not filed statement of case despite granting time on 6.8.2013. The right of the respondents to file statement of case is lost.
- 11 July 2014. Matter is complete. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2014.07.14 16:59:21 IST Reason:
- 29 August 2018. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties for some time. As prayed, list the matter next week as Part-Heard.
- 5 September 2018. Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length, we think that the issue can be resolved as the parties are family members. Taking into consideration the relationship of the parties, we are of the view that the matter can be settled by way of mediation. Accordingly, we direct the parties to appear before the Sup
- 5 April 2019. List after summer vacation.
- 31 January 2020. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks' time to do the needful.
- 21 November 2022. The legal representative of respondent no. 1 has filed an application for substitution. There is a delay of 4762 days in filing the application. It transpires that the petitioner had at an earlier point of time represented that they are deleting from the array of parties and that oral application was allowed. I.A. Nos.
- 14 February 2025. 1. No representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. Service upon the proposed respondents is complete.
- 9 April 2025. IA No. 50245/2025, IA No. 50248/2025, IA No. 50247/2025 Delay condoned. 2. Abatement is set aside.
- 22 May 2025. The reply filed on behalf of the appellant to the application for substitution is barred by 27 days. Delay is condoned. The reply be taken on record. List before the regular Bench.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. V. Hansaria, Ms. Reena Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Mr Rahul Kumar, Mr. Raghenth Basant, Mr. Raj Mohan Gupta, Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Mr. Vishwajeet Bhati, Ms. Mrinal Kanwar, Mr. Krishna Dutta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewari, Mr. Reepak Kansal, Mr. Sumit R.Sharma, Mr. Ajay Choudhary, Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Saurabh Singh Chauhan, Mr. Kamlendr Mishra, Ms. Saroj Tripathi, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Naveen Kumar Tripathi
