- 8 January 2024. 1. Heard learned Solicitor General appearing for the petitioners and perused the material placed on record. 2. Application seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed.
- 9 February 2024. 1. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file counter affidavit. 2. List after four weeks.
- 30 April 2024. 1. The matter is not taken up. 2. List after eight weeks.
- 2 September 2024. 1. List on 9-9-2024. 2. In the meantime, the learned Advocate-on-Record appearing for the petitioners states that she will try to find out some via media in the instant case.
- 9 September 2024. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to produce the rules with regard to the compulsory retirement of an employee. 2. List the matter after two weeks.
- 19 November 2024. 1. The matter is not taken up. 2. List on 26.11.2024.
- 26 November 2024. 1. Application seeking permission to appear and argue in-person is granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent appearing in-person.
- 31 July 2025. Sole respondent is appearing in person. As per office report, neither sole respondent in person nor counsel for the appellant have filed brief notes of submissions and convenience compilation, in light of Hon'ble Court's order dated 26.11.2024. However, today sole respondent in person sought time to file the same. In t
- 23 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ms. Praveena Gautam, Mr. Pawan Shukla, Ms. Akanksha Tyagi, Mr. Raja Ram, Ms. Kanika Kalyan, Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas, Mr. Rohan Bansla Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Mr. Saurabh Singh, Mr. Mainak Sarkar, Mr. Rahul K. Shaji