BANGALORE NORTH TALUK Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. LENGTHY LIST OF DATES (C.A. 10553/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 10553/2025

Case Record

C.A. 10553/2025

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

REGISTRAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

18 PDF renditions· 18 distinct judicial orders· 17 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. C.A. 10553/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010074122021. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 17 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 5 July 2021 to 12 January 2026.

On 21 January 2022 the order records: Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 prays for and is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.3, but none has entered appearance on behalf of the said respondent.
On 4 March 2022 the order records: Respondent nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time as final opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
On 19 April 2022 the order records: Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have not filed counter affidavit despite grant of final opportunity on the earlier occasion; as such, further opportunity stands declined. Service is complete on respondent no.3, but none has entered appearance.
On 15 September 2023 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an application would be filed shortly seeking deletion of the names of unserved respondent Nos.4 to 9 from the array of parties. 2. Needful shall be done within four weeks from today.
On 19 February 2024 the order records: Learned counsel for the petitioner in SLP (C) No. 5637/2021 prays for and is granted two weeks' time as a last opportunity to file an appropriate application for deletion of respondent Nos. 4 to 9.
On 5 April 2024 the order records: IA No. 58690/2024 in SLP (C) No. 5637/2021. Application for deletion of respondents No.4 to 9 from the array of the parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner.
On 29 April 2024 the order records: Respondent nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
On 12 January 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.4 to 9 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated contd.. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are duly represented.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

5 July 2021. Issue notice returnable in four weeks.
21 January 2022. Ld. counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 prays for and is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.3, but none has entered appearance on behalf of the said respondent.
4 March 2022. Respondent nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time as final opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
19 April 2022. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have not filed counter affidavit despite grant of final opportunity on the earlier occasion; as such, further opportunity stands declined. Service is complete on respondent no.3, but none has entered appearance.
10 February 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps to serve unserved respondent Nos. 4 to 9. Learned counsel representing the petitioner in SLP ( C) No. 5637/2021 accepts notice for respondent No.3, the name be depicted accordingly.
10 July 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to cure the defects. (SHUBHAM YADAV) (RAVINDER KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
15 September 2023. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an application would be filed shortly seeking deletion of the names of unserved respondent Nos.4 to 9 from the array of parties. 2. Needful shall be done within four weeks from today.
29 January 2024. Learned counsel prays for and is granted two weeks time to file application for deletion of respondent Nos.4 to 9. Learned counsel in SLP [C] No.19021/2021 has already filed the application to delete respondent Nos.5 to 10.
19 February 2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner in SLP (C) No. 5637/2021 prays for and is granted two weeks' time as a last opportunity to file an appropriate application for deletion of respondent Nos. 4 to 9.
11 March 2024. List the matter after two weeks. (GEETA JOSHI) (VEENA RANI NAGPAL) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
5 April 2024. IA No. 58690/2024 in SLP (C) No. 5637/2021. Application for deletion of respondents No.4 to 9 from the array of the parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner.
29 April 2024. Respondent nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
23 April 2025. list these matters next week.
14 May 2025. List on 29.07.2025.
29 July 2025. List next week.
5 August 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Let the record of the courts below be called for.
12 January 2026. Respondent Nos.4 to 9 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated contd.. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are duly represented.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Arun Kumar, Mr. Neeraj Sastry, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr. Dharam Singh, Ms. Nitika Pancholi, Mr Anand Sanjay, Mr Dharm Singh, Mr Unmukt Gera, Mr. Dharm Singh, Mr. Shiva Swaroop, Ms. Nandini Pandey Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Nitika Pancholi, Ms Lakshmi Shastri, Mr Pabitra Kumar Biswal, Ms. Nandani Gupta, Mr. A.K. Sharma, Mr. Yashvika Sharma, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Susheel Tomar, Ms. Akriti Arya

Relief Sought & Granted

On 12 January 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent Nos.4 to 9 have been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers' order dated contd.. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are duly represented.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 12 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 12 Jan 2026

Next hearing

12 Jan 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 17 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.