BADRI PRASAD (DEAD) THR. LRS Versus RAM AKCHHAIBER (DEAD) THR. LRS AND ORS. substitution along with O.T.) is to be listed. SUBSTITUTION (C.A. 13412/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13412/2024

Case Record

C.A. 13412/2024

BADRI PRASAD (DEAD) THR. LRS Versus RAM AKCHHAIBER (DEAD) THR. LRS AND ORS. substitution along with O.T.) is to be listed. SUBSTITUTION

SH. APOORV SINGH

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

22 PDF renditions· 22 distinct judicial orders· 22 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

BADRI PRASAD (DEAD) THR. LRS Versus RAM AKCHHAIBER (DEAD) THR. LRS & ORS.. C.A. 13412/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010103042018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 22 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 9 April 2018 to 1 September 2026.

On 6 July 2018 the order records: At the request made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondents, list the matter on 09.07.2018.
On 26 October 2020 the order records: Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and noting that the respondent no.15-Nand Kishore has died on 06.04.2020, the application for substitution of legal heirs of the deceased (as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application) is allowed. Mr. Pushkar Sharma, the learned counsel is appearing for all the respond
On 12 January 2021 the order records: Not connected. Respondent no.10 has filed counter affidavit but vakalatnama has not been filed. Be filed within four weeks time.
On 27 January 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.9.1, 11 & 15.2 have filed counter affidavit. Service was complete on the remaining respondents on 27.07.2018, but none has entered appearance.
On 20 April 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 9.1 and 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.15.2 is duly represented.
On 18 May 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 9.1 & 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no. 15.2 is duly represented.
On 27 July 2026 the order records: Respondent nos. 9.1 & 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no. 15.2 is duly represented.
On 1 September 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.9.1 and 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.15.2 is duly represented.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

9 April 2018. As requested, list the matter after four weeks.
6 July 2018. At the request made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondents, list the matter on 09.07.2018.
9 July 2018. Issue notice. In the meantime, the parties are directed to maintain status quo as it exists today.
5 December 2018. Delay in filing the application for substitution is condoned. The application for substitution is allowed.
10 January 2019. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 1 to 5, 7,10,11 and 12 to 15 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. Service is complete on respondent nos. 6 and 8 but none has entered appearance.
25 February 2019. Await service/track report in respect of respondent Nos.1 to 5, 7 and 10 to 15. Service is complete on respondent Nos.6 and 8 but none has entered appearance.
8 April 2019. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1,6 and 8 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith complete address of respondent nos. 10 to 15 to effect service on respondent nos. 2 to 5, 7 and 10 to 15 within two weeks time.
17 July 2019. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 6, 8 and 10 to 15 but none has entered appearance. Opportunity to respondent No.9 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
23 October 2019. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 to 8 and 10 to 15 but none has entered appearance. Opportunity to respondent no.9 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
26 October 2020. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and noting that the respondent no.15-Nand Kishore has died on 06.04.2020, the application for substitution of legal heirs of the deceased (as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application) is allowed. Mr. Pushkar Sharma, the learned counsel is appearing for all the respond
4 December 2020. Ld. counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 8, 10, 11, 13 and 1 4 is granted four weeks' time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Await service report in respect of respondent Nos.15(i) to 15(iv).
12 January 2021. Not connected. Respondent no.10 has filed counter affidavit but vakalatnama has not been filed. Be filed within four weeks time.
30 October 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objections to the IA No.80965/2022 for deletion of name of the legal heir No.15(iv) and IA No.117323/2022 to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent no.10. Accordingly, both the applications are allowed.
30 January 2024. List on 7.5.2024. Since this matter is of the year 2018, it is made clear that no further adjournment will be granted.
7 May 2024. List on 13.8.2024. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks from today.
5 November 2024. List on 26.11.2024.
26 November 2024. Leave granted. Hearing expedited.
27 January 2026. Respondent Nos.9.1, 11 & 15.2 have filed counter affidavit. Service was complete on the remaining respondents on 27.07.2018, but none has entered appearance.
20 April 2026. Respondent nos. 9.1 and 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.15.2 is duly represented.
18 May 2026. Respondent nos. 9.1 & 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no. 15.2 is duly represented.
27 July 2026. Respondent nos. 9.1 & 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent no. 15.2 is duly represented.
1 September 2026. Respondent Nos.9.1 and 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.15.2 is duly represented.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. S.R. Sigh, Mr. Dhruv Paliwal, Mr. Mangal Prasad, Ms. Sumita Pandit, Mr. Ankur Yadav, Mr. S.R. Singh, Mr. Avnish Singh, Mr. Mohd. Muztaba, Ms. Sunita Pandey, Ms Sunita Pandit, Ms. Anita Tripathi, Ms Anita Tripathi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Mr. Pushkar Sharma, Ms. Isha Bhardwaj, Mr Pushkar Sharma, Mr Salim Ansari, Mr. Ashim Sood, Mr. Mayank Pandey, Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Ms. Anjesh Dahiya, Mr. Ekansh Gupta, Mr. Vedant Sharma, Ms. Naghma Bi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 1 September 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent Nos.9.1 and 11 have already filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.15.2 is duly represented.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 1 Sept 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 1 Sept 2026

Next hearing

27 Jan 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 22 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.