- 16 October 2023. Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Issue notice returnable in four weeks only with respect to the contention on contributed negligence alone.
- 28 November 2023. Service is complete on respondent Nos.1,2,4 and 5 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted three weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondent No.3.
- 16 January 2024. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.5 has filed counter affidavit.
- 26 February 2024. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file an Application for substituted service in respect of respondent No.3. Be filed within two weeks. If filed, process as per rules.
- 18 April 2024. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have failed to file counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an Application for substituted service through paper publication in respect of respondent No.3. Application stands allowed. P
- 25 July 2024. Respondent nos.1 and 2 have failed to file CA, despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined. Respondent no.5 has already filed counter affidavit.
- 11 September 2024. Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent no.5 has filed counter affidavit.
- 11 December 2024. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court, the paragraphs 16 and 21 of the Trial Court judgment, where the negligence on the part of the driver of the canter goods vehicle has also been held to be proved. It is submitted that notwithstanding the same, ultimately the negligence has
- 6 January 2025. Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Leave granted.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. T.S, Mr. Narendra Kumar, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, Ms. T.s.shanthi, Mrs. T.S. Shanthi, Mrs. T. S. Shanthi, Mr. T.S. Shanthi, Mr. Raghunath Jha, Ms. Sneha Irine Kachhap, Ms. Hema Malik, Mrs. T.s.shanthi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Dharm Singh, Mr. Anand Sanjay, Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Ms. Akhila Wali, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Mrs. Samina, Mr. Abhishekh Singh, Mr. Abhishek Gola, Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Mr. Rishabh Mathur, Mr. Shubhit Malhotra
