- 11 March 2015. The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellant and the Ld.counsel for the respondent have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 26.07.2013 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Suprem e Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a
- 23 November 2023. The respondent has not entered the appearance ever since notice was issued in the matter on 05.07.2011. It is evident from the record that the appellant has not sought for personal service through dasti mode and it is possible that the normal mode of service of notice would not have reached the respondent. As the High
- 21 February 2024. Adjourn by four weeks in view of the death of the respondent. (JATINDER KAUR) (NIDHI WASON) P.S. to REGISTRAR
- 15 May 2024. It is represented that the sole respondent has passed away and an application for substitution to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent has been filed along with application for setting aside abatement and condonation of delay in filing setting aside abatement. Let notice be issued o
- 14 November 2024. Service of notice is complete proposed Lr No. 1 and 3 of deceased sole respondent, there is no appearance. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to proposed Lr. No.2 of deceased sole respondent.
- 8 April 2025. Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed fresh and correct particulars alongwith application seeking condonation of delay in filing particulars. Application is defective. Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects. Service is complete on the proposed Lr. nos. 1 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 22 May 2025. Service is complete on proposed lr.nos. 1 and 3 but none has entered appearance. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to Ld.
- 19 September 2025. Service is complete on the proposed legal representative nos. 1 and 3 but none has entered appearance. As per office report, ld. Counsel for the appellant has not cured the defects in the application seeking condonation of delay in filing fresh particulars for service on proposed legal representative no.2 despite last
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. R. Chandrachud, Mr. V. Prabhakar, Ms. Jyoti Parashar, Mr. N.j. Ramchandar, Mr. Dhuli Venkata Krishna, Mr. N. J. Ramchandar, Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Mr. Ajitha Rajan, Mr. Nanchil J. Deekshith, Ms. Jyoti Parasher, Ms. Ajitha R.
