AVINASH SHARMA AND ORS. XIV-A [P-3], [P-4] Versus YOGENDER PAL VERMA AND ORS. Applications for substitution are to be listed. APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT SUBSTITUTION ABATEMENT (C.A. 13970/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 13970/2024

Case Record

C.A. 13970/2024

AVINASH SHARMA AND ORS. XIV-A [P-3], [P-4] Versus YOGENDER PAL VERMA AND ORS. Applications for substitution are to be listed. APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT SUBSTITUTION ABATEMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Land Land Mutation

23 PDF renditions· 23 distinct judicial orders· 22 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

AVINASH SHARMA & ORS. Versus YOGENDER PAL VERMA & ORS.. C.A. 13970/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010347372018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 22 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 13 November 2018 to 13 February 2026.

On 3 December 2018 the order records: In the present matter, the issue whether the petitioners were competent to purchase the interest in the lands in question by virtue of Section 118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act is still pending consideration with the revenue authorities. It is, therefore, submitted that either the Civil Court sho
On 21 January 2019 the order records: Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of respondent no.1 in SLP (C) No.30187/2018 and sole respondent in SLP (C) No.32802/2018. He prays for and is allowed to file appropriate affidavit within four weeks from today. The petitioners shall take fresh steps to serve the unserved respondents. Da
On 16 April 2019 the order records: We have heard Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. For the reasons stated in the application, application (IA NO.15576 of 2019) is allowed and respondents no.2 to 6 are ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties at the risk of the petitioners.
On 7 July 2023 the order records: IA No. 26247/2020, IA No. 26233/2020 and IA No. 26241/2020 are not pressed by the counsel for the petitioners. The interlocutory applications are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application for transposition.
On 8 August 2023 the order records: Application has been filed by the petitioners seeking transposition of petitioner-Vinay Kumar Sharma. The counsel for the respondent has also filed an application for deletion of respondent-Yogender Pal Verma and to join subsequent purchaser.
On 8 January 2024 the order records: 151172 of 2023 – applications for Transposition are allowed. Amended memo of parties be filed within one week.
On 11 March 2024 the order records: Learned counsel for the parties are directed to file affidavit of the latest position of the revenue proceedings and bringing the subsequent events on record. Relist the matter after two weeks.
On 13 February 2026 the order records: IA DIARY NOS.186348, 186346 & 186347/2025 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.13970/2024 Perused the interlocutory applications and heard the learned counsel. All the above mentioned interlocutory applications are allowed. 2. The legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 are permitted to be brought on record. The needful be done within a

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

13 November 2018. Delay of 9 days in refiling is condoned. Process as per rules.
3 December 2018. In the present matter, the issue whether the petitioners were competent to purchase the interest in the lands in question by virtue of Section 118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act is still pending consideration with the revenue authorities. It is, therefore, submitted that either the Civil Court sho
21 January 2019. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of respondent no.1 in SLP (C) No.30187/2018 and sole respondent in SLP (C) No.32802/2018. He prays for and is allowed to file appropriate affidavit within four weeks from today. The petitioners shall take fresh steps to serve the unserved respondents. Da
16 April 2019. We have heard Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. For the reasons stated in the application, application (IA NO.15576 of 2019) is allowed and respondents no.2 to 6 are ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties at the risk of the petitioners.
2 August 2019. List on 9.8.2019.
9 August 2019. In view of the letter dated 07.08.2019 circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioners, these matters are adjourned to (MUKESH NASA) (SUMAN JAIN)
30 August 2019. In view of the letter dated 28.08.2019 circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent, the matter is adjourned to (MUKESH NASA) (NISHA TRIPATHI)
6 September 2019. List on 20.09.2019.
20 September 2019. List these matters on 04.10.2019.
4 October 2019. In view of the letter dated 04.10.2019 circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matters are adjourned to (MUKESH NASA) (SUMAN JAIN)
25 October 2019. In view of the letter dated 23.10.2019 circulated by the learned counsel for the respondents, the matters are adjourned to (MUKESH NASA) (SANTOSH KUMAR)
18 November 2019. List on 09.12.2019.
9 December 2019. In terms of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents, let the matter be adjourned to 17.01.2020.
17 January 2020. In view of the letter dated 16.01.2020 circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent(s), the matter is adjourned to (MUKESH NASA) (SUMAN JAIN)
14 February 2020. In view of the letter dated 12.02.2020 circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent, the matters are adjourned for two weeks.
7 July 2023. IA No. 26247/2020, IA No. 26233/2020 and IA No. 26241/2020 are not pressed by the counsel for the petitioners. The interlocutory applications are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application for transposition.
8 August 2023. Application has been filed by the petitioners seeking transposition of petitioner-Vinay Kumar Sharma. The counsel for the respondent has also filed an application for deletion of respondent-Yogender Pal Verma and to join subsequent purchaser.
8 January 2024. 151172 of 2023 – applications for Transposition are allowed. Amended memo of parties be filed within one week.
11 March 2024. Learned counsel for the parties are directed to file affidavit of the latest position of the revenue proceedings and bringing the subsequent events on record. Relist the matter after two weeks.
26 November 2024. 1. Leave granted. 2. Compliance affidavit in furtherance to proceedings dated 11.03.2024 shall be filed within four weeks.
5 December 2025. 1. Issue notice to the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1, returnable in eight weeks. 2. List the matter on 13.02.2026.
13 February 2026. IA DIARY NOS.186348, 186346 & 186347/2025 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.13970/2024 Perused the interlocutory applications and heard the learned counsel. All the above mentioned interlocutory applications are allowed. 2. The legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 are permitted to be brought on record. The needful be done within a
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Mr. Manan Daga, Mr. C. George Thomas Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Ms. Jaya Tomar, Mr. Abhishek Jain, Ms. Anusha Agarwal, Mr. Sunil K. Jain, Mrs. Jaya Tomar, Ms. Akansha Chugh, Ms. Rashika Swarup, Mr. Aditya Parashar, Mr. Aditya Parasher, Ms. Pratishtha

Relief Sought & Granted

On 7 July 2023 the order records: 26241/2020 are not pressed by the counsel for the petitioners. The interlocutory applications are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application for transposition.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Land Land Mutation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 13 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 13 Feb 2026

Next hearing

3 Dec 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 22 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.