- 12 March 2026. Tag with Civil Appeal No.3132/2026.
- 24 March 2026. 1. As per the office report dated 23.03.2026, service on respondent nos. 3 and 4 is incomplete. The learned counsel for the petitioner to take appropriate steps for effecting service of notice on the said respondents. 2. List the appeals next week.
- 2 April 2026. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Issue notice.
- 29 April 2026. 1. Heard Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the authorized representative of the home buyers, Mr. Rachit Mittal, learned counsel appearing for M/s New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) – Respondent No.1. 2. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, learned Senior Counsel, brought to our notice that the Resolutio
- 30 July 2026. 1. After hearing the matter for quite some time, we are of the view that the presence of SRA is also necessary. 2. We implead the SRA as party respondent no.5. The details of the SRA are as under:
- 20 August 2026. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Judgment reserved.
- 1 September 2026. 1. On 20-8-2026, the appeals were reserved for Judgment. 2. These appeals are listed today for seeking clarification.
- 3 September 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 3 September 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rachit Mittal, Mr. Parish Mishra, Mr. Shubham Sonthalia, Mr. Kanishk Raj, Ms. Srishti Agrawaal, Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Mr. Shivansh Bansal, Mr. Yashraj Singh, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Mr. Ravinder Singh, Ms. Raveesha Gupta, Mr. Ritvik Bharadwaj Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, Ms. Shrutee Aradhana, Mr. Sanyam Saxena, Mr. Sahil Sethi, Mr. Ravinder Singh, Ms. Raveesha Gupta, Mr. Ritvik Bharadwaj, Ms. Garima Jain, Mr. Rachit, Mr. Yashraj Singh, Mr. Parish Mishra, Mr. Shubham Sonthalia
